2007-04-08 00:22:20 · 12 answers · asked by sudheerkunta 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
No, I feel it will be in the air, missles flying every where and bringing an end to the world as we know it. .
2007-04-08 00:31:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, because the U.S. has by far the greatest Navy in the world. Besides our modern ships, our subs could easily decimate any enemy, and if a war were fought on water, we could probably use nukes if the situation were dire because the fallout wold not contaminate any land mass.
2007-04-08 07:33:37 · answer #2 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Considering the second world war was played out over both land and water, I think it is somewhat obvious.
2007-04-08 07:28:43 · answer #3 · answered by Lief Tanner 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I doubt it, It will probably be caused BY water, or the need for it. With climate change and mass droughts expected, it wouldnt suprise me if countries started taking water from one another at gunpoint.
2007-04-08 07:26:30 · answer #4 · answered by jademonkey 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
ill be a 72 hour war
2007-04-12 05:44:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. It's going to kick off in the desert lands. Middle East area.
2007-04-08 07:26:43 · answer #6 · answered by cartfan300 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
its going to be under water
2007-04-08 07:25:46 · answer #7 · answered by saaayruh 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No it is hard to rebuild a temple in the middle of the ocean.
2007-04-08 07:28:04 · answer #8 · answered by john c 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, it will be about money again. Same old boring story. I think it's time to stop.
2007-04-08 07:38:19 · answer #9 · answered by Alex G 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, it will be nuclear in nature, and that will be beginning of the end for all of us on earth.
2007-04-08 07:37:57 · answer #10 · answered by WC 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋