English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I want everybody to answer it and if it is possible,its not bad to have political disscussion on my YAHOO-E_MAIL:
Untouchable_In_Love@Yahoo.Com
Im waiting for seeing you soon.

2007-04-07 18:29:53 · 11 answers · asked by untouchable_in_love 1 in Politics & Government Embassies & Consulates

11 answers

shamefull for who ?????for iran coz they defend their dignity or for british marines coz they are in place not for them????? it is shame for british marines they do not have right not to be in iraqi water or in iranian water it is not their home sthey have to stop puting their nose in others affairs tell me what ur government will do if there were a family live in a house then a stranger comes and attacks them saying the dad is bad and controled everything in the house without having any right they killed the dad and they take the mum and the kids and the house without any right all the armies there are strangers get out of their land u do not have right to be in iraqi water or iranian water u r there only for petrol and other natural sources of those countries

2007-04-08 14:41:47 · answer #1 · answered by pharaoh 1 · 0 0

Horrible!Your government captured 15 British sailors in Iraqi waters for no reason!Their argument that we were on their waters is irrelevant,since the very first video showed incorrect coordinates,and the Iranians quickly sent a second video to rescind this.Also the freed British sailors also said that coercion and psychological torture was used against them.

2007-04-08 01:39:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The entire event was shameful, both for the Iranians
who conducted the illegal kidnapping and for the British
who lacked the courage & will to either resist, fight back
or come take the soldiers back by force....The British
soldier also behaved like cowards...
This would have been a perfect opportunity to destroy
Iran's navy, air-force and nuclear facilities...

2007-04-08 01:40:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I don't think he/she will get rude emails. I think a lot of people would love to find out more from an actual Iranian citizen.

I don't think anyone actually knows why they released them. It's all speculation.

(His GOVERNMENT did, Thomas. Iran is not a free country.)

2007-04-08 01:38:40 · answer #4 · answered by tttplttttt 5 · 0 0

I think to ease the current tension in the Middle East. It was a good decision by the Iranian authorities.

2007-04-08 14:10:58 · answer #5 · answered by Zain 7 · 0 1

dang, you're gonna get a lot of email this week. a lot of it not gonna be too nice.

it's my opinion that this was really based on the long standing border dispute with iraq. iraq has no legally defined maritime border at the shatt al arab. "Iraq's lack of a maritime boundary with Iran prompts jurisdiction disputes beyond the mouth of the Shatt al Arab in the Persian Gulf" ~ https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ir.html

2007-04-08 01:37:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

maybe try Match . com
write another question tell us what you
think about the US and all that

the soldiers were released and
not a big surprise they were not
at a tea party

it took days and Turkey got involved
but ...
Happy trolling

2007-04-08 01:38:10 · answer #7 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 0 1

It was the right thing to do as they should not have been taken prisoner's in the first place

2007-04-08 01:39:12 · answer #8 · answered by ED L 1 · 0 0

It's a good thing they were British and not American. Otherwise, you would still be trying to put out the fires.

2007-04-08 01:38:55 · answer #9 · answered by jhartmann21 4 · 0 2

Thank you Mr President.
How was she?

2007-04-08 02:15:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers