Intelligent design could be posited as bio-mechanical machines being pre-programmed to change rapidly in event of a near extinction event?
An affected species would thus give spontaneous birth, in mass, to a mutation and then simply die out leaving in it's place the new species, being a mutated adaptation, which not only explains an incomplete fossil record but would also account for there existing sufficent numbers for the mutation to be viable, replicatable, and sustainable.
Such as described would explain the incomplete fossil record because there was no long drawn out incremental changes over eons.
This would imply that there is a pre-existent program, for purpose of continuation of a bio-mechanical machine in response to the triggering of an event that would not permit it to continue unless and but for activation of an adaptive mutation program?
Evolution may exist but so does apparently another vehicle providing for more rapid adaptation?
2007-04-07
17:17:30
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Raymond
1
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Am through with it, but that is what I am saying there is no evolution and/or there is another variable at play that can trigger spontaneous mutation. This other variable is a program incorporate within a bio-mechanical machine that is indicative of Intelligent Design. In other words you inhabit a machine and don;t know it. But the Bible states that we dwell in a tent, and that tent is a bio-mechanical contrivance.
2007-04-07
17:43:04 ·
update #1
Oh yeah, good night, and Happy Easter.
2007-04-07
17:43:50 ·
update #2
Life is not the machine, the machine is merely a conveyance for life. Do not want response. If you believe in the Bible you have to agree, because the Bible states that to be true. And so does every culture and religion in the world over the expanse of time. Daoism, martial arts it is chi, and so on, all in agreement.
2007-04-07
18:05:55 ·
update #3
Novangel: Thanks. Thats all it is, reaching. The fossil thing is odd to me cause there are fossils all over the place in my neighborhood, Florida on the coast, and recently, like a month ago, at a nearby park an individual found a bone sticking out of the ground which has led to a major discovery of yet another large deposit of fossils.
That OBE thing is another component. I know idiots claim it to be electrical discharges giving false esensation but that is not true at all. There are recorded instances of OBE, for instance a man undergoing operation under anesthesia, recalls to the surgeons after regaining conciousness what the surgeons were doing, including personnel that were behind curtains proving that the patient could not have seen them at all but for OBE.
I honestly believe there are those that do not want people to know OBE is true.
2007-04-07
19:17:35 ·
update #4
No. The incomplete fossil record is evidence that fossilization is a rare event.
Natural selection and environmental shift can trigger rapid decreases in biomass with selective pressures do to niche disruption. Since we have sequenced numerous genomes and watched creatures respond to selective pressures, we know they generate new genetic structures in multiple manners. There is no ontological program.
You're hypothesis cannot be rejected outright, but like all ID hypotheses, it cannot be tested.
2007-04-07 18:35:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by novangelis 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Intelligent Design presents a counter-example to the idea that all life began with a simple life form and evolved into more and more complex lifeforms solely by natural laws and natural selection. It says (in part) that certain biological structures are so complex and are so completely unlikely to have come together by pure chance that it is necessary that there must have been some type of designer. Keep in mind that ID says absolutely nothing about the identity of the designer which is evidenced in nature. It merely points out that the appearance of design coupled with the mathematical remoteness that some system arose purely by natural causes (making it pretty much impossible that it could happen naturally) means that something outside of nature had a hand in creating some of these systems. ID goes to the very heart of Darwinian evolutionary theory because, if correct, there is no way that evolution can be the sole basis for the incredible complexity in life we see on Earth (and ID may even be responsible for that life occurring in the first place). Intelligent Design is a scientific hypothesis that has not been proven wrong any more than evolution has been proven wrong. It is simply a counter-example to the reigning scientific belief in step-by-step evolution. If it weren't for the fact that it challenges the sacred cow of evolution, ID would be qualify as proper science since it uses counter-example and statistics to challenge a part of the evolutionary scheme. The only problem is that the part that it challenges is the very heart of the theory. That offends today's scientists who instead of following the evidence no matter where it leads are wedded to the idea of naturalism as the only legitimate foundation stone for proper scientific inquiry and will not even consider any other possibility.
2016-05-19 22:41:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by margarite 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Incomplete fossil record is only proof of Intelligent Design, if lack of Noah's Ark proves that the biblical account of that story never happened. Christians can't have it both ways.
2007-04-07 17:32:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
An incomplete fossil record only implies an incomplete fossil record. Life on earth is 3 billion years old. We have only been studying fossils of two hundred years.
2007-04-07 17:27:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by October 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
The bible does not give a complete description of every day of its (preposed) 4000 years. It is incomplete, does this make it more likely that non-believers are therefore right.
Incomplete = incomplete, not non existing.
Also - no need to speed things up in evolution, there is 4.75 billions years for things to evolve in.
2007-04-07 17:25:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Freethinking Liberal 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Nope.
The incomplete fossil record proves how complex a process fossilization is and how few creatures actually become fossils and in turn how few fossils survive to be found.
2007-04-07 18:32:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
lol sounds like evolution. Evolutionis called "white man's joke" by most African's. Also, those who don't believe in a God, such as Atheists, try to explain ways and ideas to come up with an explaination for life... If you went to a rainforest in Brazil, and found a watch in it, you wouldn't say " O, I wonder what this evolved from", because it has intelligent design behind it. Also, there are tons of different kinds of dogs out there and all shapes and sizes. But there still dogs one way or another... Did you know that muslims, catjolics, mormens, jews, and Christians have in common? They al believe in a God, or an all powerful being that controls everything. Atheists don't believe their is a God because they want to think they control their lives. that's why they don't believe in fate or destiny. My regaurds, May God be with you. Jesus' shockwave
2007-04-07 17:33:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by stargazercrazydude 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
The only way some people are going to believe in Evolution is if all the fossils are laid end to end.
2007-04-07 17:21:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by S K 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Where did you ever get this idea from. It is one of the most bizarre and uninformed statements I have heard in over 10 years.
2007-04-07 17:23:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by U-98 6
·
2⤊
0⤋