English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Now that the Pentagon has officially gone on record stating categorically that Saddam had nothing to do with Al Queda and that Bush and his cronies definetly lied so as to wage war for their personal gain on a nation innocent of any involvement in the September 11th slaughter. Would you agree that the United Nations should brand and prosecute George Bush as a murderous war criminal. Would you also agree that Tony Blair's Playschool Mistress should sent him to the bold corner for being thick enough to play follow the leader with such a bad influence. Would you also agree that Rice is peculiar looking.

2007-04-07 10:34:58 · 11 answers · asked by Jumpin Jack Flash 3 in Society & Culture Languages

11 answers

Rice and Bush - spot on
Blair - wrong - he deserves the same as Bush.

2007-04-07 10:38:21 · answer #1 · answered by luna 3 · 3 1

Yes most definately, why not? Bush and Blair should be impeached and prosecuted as war criminals, preferably somewhere that would carry out the death sentence upon conviction. I'l probably get the CIA coming round my house now with shotguns. And yes most importantly, Miss Rice is Miss Rice and not Mrs Rice for 2 reasons:

1. She is ugly as fcuk.
&
2. She is a lesbian (ahem.. allegedly of course)

2007-04-10 04:39:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes to prosecuting Bush; no to sending Blair to the corner, he should be prosecuted too; but I actually like rice, what's that got to do with...oh...you mean that Conda-what's-her-face, ( I am English!)
She's no Halle Berry, is she?

I heard someone on the radio today (April 10th) say that we are governed by a bunch of incompetents who know the profit of everything and the value of nothing (I'll just add; especially human life, to this). I know that sums up our government (I'm British), does it sum up the American government too?

2007-04-07 14:05:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

bush had the cofort of saying this is a war against TERROR. he wont stand any trial soon. maybe a few hundred years from now when the oil is gone and the planet is burning,maybe just maybe we can look for somone to blame. but when there are no shrubs left to burn,who do you blame? I do have a pencahnt for wild/basmati rice

2007-04-07 14:25:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If the rules the victors of the second world war made up for the Nazi leaders they captured were applied to Bush and Blair they would have to be hanged. The Nazis were hanged because they started and carried aot an aggressive war, not for anything else.

2007-04-07 11:09:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

If you placed that question in the wrong section in the hope that those whose job it is to watch people who say such things wouldn't notice, I fear you have wasted your time!

I take the fifth, on the grounds that this has nothing to do with languages. Watch your back ... Jumpin' Jack!

Joking aside ... this is an interesting question, but why do you think I spend 95% of my time on Answers in this dusty corner with the other cardigan wearers? ;-)

2007-04-07 11:28:18 · answer #6 · answered by Cosimo )O( 7 · 0 3

Yes, yes, and yes. Also why was Saddam not tried in the Hague like the Milosevitch? I agreed he should be hung, and in the Hague that would not of happened, but one rule for one, and one for the others.

2007-04-07 10:45:38 · answer #7 · answered by chi-chi 3 · 2 2

yes yes yes yes yes yes
bush blair , is a war criminal .
also olmart
those people need a doctor for they minds

2007-04-07 10:56:28 · answer #8 · answered by jessy 2 · 0 1

Yes.

2007-04-07 11:05:44 · answer #9 · answered by Martha P 7 · 0 1

What an interesting aray of non-facts you have obtained.

2007-04-07 10:38:43 · answer #10 · answered by Boilerfan 5 · 2 6

fedest.com, questions and answers