If you look at a watch, you can easily tell it was designed by an intelligent watchmaker, so...?

Question

...if you look at a watch that has many flaws, malfunctions occasionally, has extra pieces and an overall crappy design, doesn't that mean the watchmaker was a poor designer, and poorly educated in the making of good quality watches, especially if all his watches came out at about the same quality?

Would you expect people to go to that watchmaker for more watches, or stop by and do things he tells them to do and give him gifts because of the phenomenal work he did on his watches?

Answer 1

The watchmaker SAID it was a rolex, but that they spelled it "Timex" because thats how they spell Rolex in French. You're saying he lied?

Answer 2

okay. thats a great counter spin to the watchmaker theory./i have no problem with being created. i don't take it personally just like whatever is behind everything doesn't seem to take it personally./created in its image,i quess

Answer 3

Brilliantly crafted question. Central park looks designed. The rain forest looks chaotic. As does anything left to its own devices.

^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^

Answer 4

Yup. unintelligent design by an unintelligent designer, who had anger managment problems on top of it all.

Answer 5

so...what are you saying.


athiest= intelligent. designer,NO!