April 12, 1861 When the Confederate forces attacked Fort Sumter in South Carolina. $10 PLEASE!
2007-04-07 08:27:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Calvin T 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I will give anyone that gives the correct answer $10 cash money. I am not kidding, I will post an edit after a while with the correct answer if no one gets this right! :)
Conception of the Confederate States of America developed over a number of years.
Hostilities began prior to the bombardment of Ft. Sumter by South Carolina Militia (Citadel cadets) under the Command of Gen. Beauregard on April 12, 1861.
The first shots of the conflict took place on January 9, 1861. Citadel cadets fired on the Union Flagged ship Star of the West, as it was attempting to resupply the federal garrison Ft. Sumter. SC had demanded the fort be vacated numerous times, and the Ft. Commander refused. The Star of the West was given one warning shot across the bow, followed by to cannon hits. Star of the West aborted it mission and left.
That is the story! No bucks lost...
2007-04-07 08:35:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Blitzpup 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
You have asked 2 different questions. Which answer do you want? The day and place it started or when it was conceived? They are not the same.
2007-04-07 10:08:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by iraq51 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It began in Congress on December 18, 1860 with The Crittenden Compromise
2007-04-07 08:42:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
correct it really is the project we in u.s. come across ourselves in. really, we've 2 ranges of threat-loose practices for our u . s ., our voters and our structure. One is the criminal Justice gadget. the diverse is the dep. of protection. right away, the activities of 9/11 have shown that we are coping with a sparkling type of probability that falls someplace between both. Hijacking an airplane replaced into traditionally a criminal offense and dealt with via the criminal Justice gadget. Flying guided missiles into homes replaced into traditionally a protection stress action and dealt with via the DOD. Terrorism crosses the line between both. In reaction we were given the following up with the Patriot Act. i imagine, and so did the persons of Congress from both activities who exceeded it, it replaced correct right into a fantastic stability. contained contained in the perfect few election cycles there has been different posturing and condemnation strong upon the President and the Patriot Act as some type of seriouse breach of constutional protocol and idea. This replaced into usually nonsense and fairly accomplished for political causes, you comprehend, playing to the bottom. suitable is somewhat of writing you'll come throughout the time of interesting. i do no longer study about fairly anybody else yet I really have self conception that the Patriot Act is a prudent diploma to handle the very genuine probability we are coping with. to go back to the status quo contained in the previous this chance to our u . s . is neutralized is in simple terms foolhardy. could you want to board a airplane the placement no individual is screened contained in the previous boarding? the placement we do not bypass thorough metal detectors or have our luggage X-rayed? that's the way it replaced into once. which could no longer prudent, is it? similar for the Patriot Act. I do agree that close monitoring of those entrusted with it really is taken into consideration mandatory. I really have self conception that's likewise being dealt with. on an similar time as abuse via a few persons of the FBI replaced into were given the following throughout the time of they were disiplined and disregarded. .
2016-11-27 01:45:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋