I am seriously laughing! I just do not know what to write. Except... the word 'always' is such a catalyst for vehement response on this site.
2007-04-07 00:48:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by thankyou "iana" 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
Depends on the Atheist. Some are against all theists. Some are just tired of mainstream Christianity, because that is the religious majority here and in the real world. And it's not always Christians attacking Atheists... it's people attacking people... because damn near everyone does it. =)
2007-04-07 01:06:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kithy 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
~~~Deadman ,,,, Seriously, because most theists in Western Culture are christian and since they hold the same Subjective Claim of a Superior God they feel that the only Theist should be a Christian Theist. Personally I find the attacks to be a Two Way Street.
2007-04-07 06:34:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sensei TeAloha 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't understand what Christians hope to gain by attacking anyone, especially as it's they who then complain that they're the ones being attacked.
As for atheists, I have no quarrel with them.
I mean, once you get past the fact that they're amoral baby eaters, they can be quite good conversationalists.
2007-04-07 01:11:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Orac 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
There are some Muslims here who attack atheists as well. I've even gotten that kind of hate mail from someone who claimed to be pagan, which really surprised me.
But yes, it's mostly Christians who think that this is a site for attacking atheists.
2007-04-07 00:51:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
I'm a theist, and well I think that statement is unrealiable and untrue, because I think that there are some theists who push their beliefs to strongly on others but its the individual atheists and theists that attack each other, for example, you said that your an atheist againgst theists, and that shows that in a way you are attacking theists!
2007-04-07 00:49:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by dw 1
·
0⤊
3⤋
People think their opposites, but they're not. The opposite of the religious fanatic is not the fanatical atheist but the gentle cynic who cares not whether there is a god or not.
2007-04-10 09:49:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by its_whatever11 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
In the US, their are 2 primary religion. For the most part, Jews live and let live. Christians don't.
2007-04-07 03:46:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Fred 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
nicely we could positioned it this form, in case you weren't an atheist (to no longer say you would be a theist yet merely no longer atheist) could that propose you would be able to desire to no longer advance a ethical experience top or have greater worry attempting to realize this? I could wish no longer, your atheism is a factor of you which you optimistically progressed because of the fact of a few form of ethical experience no longer any opposite direction around. Your concentration on your ethical experience is yours, it does not belong to atheism as you progressed it for the reason which you felt the could. i've got confidence that sounds greater efficient and greater very own, there is not any could develop it to embody the full atheist inhabitants of the international. to assert that a persons' means to be responsible for their movements is correlated to their adherence to secularism is particularly like asserting their means to be ethical is expounded to their adherence to a faith. Neither a form of recommendations is a attainable end on morality or understanding in people. Atheism is merely a loss of concept in God(s) as i'm continuously reminded on R&S, whilst it incorporates the way you progressed a ethical experience and your option to fairly devote your self to it fairly is basically of Nikonf5 in case you question me. to assert all atheist concentration and enhancing their ethical experience is an outstanding concept yet you would be able to undergo in recommendations your no longer the avatar for each atheist merely as i'm no longer the avatar for each theist. have confidence me I actually have a cousin who's an atheist and he or she is amazingly ineffective and flighty, she does not seek for to greater efficient her ethical experience in fact she spends maximum of her time attempting to work out how she would be able responsible somebody else for her issues. She isn't that way because of the fact she is an atheist, she is merely a ineffective flighty person who occurs to be an atheist. those characteristics of hers are hers and did no longer come from her abandonment of religion, merely as your thirst for a nicely rounded ethical experience is merely you. be happy with that pal. Peace and advantages = )
2016-10-21 06:34:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by seabrooks 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
the christians attack the atheists because we are a threat to there domanation of this planet because we tell the world the truth that thay have all been conned and there religion is a lie
2007-04-07 00:47:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋