Just because we don't have an answer doesn't mean we should throw our arms in the air and default to "God did it." Science asks questiosn and seeks answers, religion gives answers and tells you to stop asking questions. By the way, you can't learn anything by blindly accepting information without question.
2007-04-06 18:15:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Psyleet 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why the big bang happened, and exactly how the first organic molecules became self-replicating, are indeed two of the biggest mysteries known to man. It's great that you are thinking about them.
But ask yourself: why are you asking those questions here, in a religion forum? Is it because you have already concluded that the Old Testament, written three thousand years ago, is somehow more accurate at answering these two big questions than everything that has been learned since then? If you really believe that, then nothing anyone says here will make any difference to you.
Let me say this though. You have no doubt heard many times from sources you trust that science does not have any answers to these questions. You've probably read answers here from people claiming to have answers, but their answers seem confusing or even outright nonsense. But the truth is that there are some excellent proposals for answering both of these questions. But to understand these proposals requires several years of education to learn the core science behind the proposals. Do you really expect that the science behind big bang cosmology is something we could explain to you in a few paragraphs here? Or likewise for the science of biochemistry behind abiogenesis?
If you genuinely want to learn truth, and are not just trying to get reinforcement for your religious beliefs, then ask your questions in a science forum, and research the science being done by serious scientists, and ignore the propaganda being told by creationists who afraid to admit that at least part of their Bible is just allegory.
2007-04-06 18:27:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jim L 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
pal The Hindu View on Cosmogony by potential of Dr. R.ok. Lahiri, PhD it rather is complete, it rather is complete, From the full the full will become appear. From the full, whilst the full is negated, What maintains to be is lower back the full - Isa Upanishad Cosmogony potential a understanding of the universe, mirrored image on, and account of it. The Hindu View Hindu Vedic faith, in its account of creation of the universe, has been very valuable and scientifically provided. In Indian custom, 2 recommendations have been in attention relating to the creation. Rta, (regulation, Rhythm,) reveal a clean experience of ordered universe to facilitate any medical or ethical discovery. It provides intending to human adventure and contemplation of the regulation of nature with out and interior of ethical regulation; combing the two for any complete description of the fact. It describes a nicely ordered universe the place the Rta prevails. Rta potential season and seasons are previous human administration yet recur with customary technique unto itself. it fairly is unusual for a faith to describe scientifically with serious account how the universe got here into existence and approximately its foundation and nature. The Vedic faith has been very out spoken. Vedas say that the muse of cosmos can't be familiar however the challenge of ordered existence could be nicely familiar. super Bang concept The Vaishnavism branch of Hinduism describes the creation of the Universe with an journey corresponding to the super Bang. it rather is defined interior the 0.33 Holy e book of the Bhagavata Purana in chapters 10 and 26. the super Bang concept is a medical concept that asserts that the Universe replaced into created approximately 13.7 billion years in the past whilst a concentration of mass exploded. This concept has super non secular implications of an outstanding Being arising the Universe. Many Christian, Jewish, Islam, Buddhist and Hindu religions or sects settle for the super Bang concept. Edit: The question has no longer something to do with the existence of God.
2016-10-21 06:18:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
well for surely now we know that god never created man from mud! but we also don't know where did the first ball of mass which is expanding came from and where did it get the energy from...... for long we have lived but looonger the univers has been so we are just fraction of a time in the history of the univerws and to say the truth the religon is even a less fraction of a period in the hueman era and if u point to single religon its even a fraction of a time. to clearly state about religions and god when we were at the forests and caves before we were able to use fire we feared without knowing what made the fire what made the wind what made the floods and as usual we started fearing them and we thought of them like huemans (great ones) and thought that we could please them by offering things to them and making them happy so that they won't hurt us. but with the boost in the knowledge of the hueman we found out the way how to use the fire and made it a slave for us and never did we pray the. and now we knok how a child is born now we know that a child can be cloned and we can make a new organism and by mutating (eg the chiken you eate as broiler is a hueman made one) so we now beleve that it is not the god created us but he must have created the first cell wher we don't have a clear explanation. and we may go on with the search and never will we sole all the misteries !!! as lond as misteries lie may there be a god and the last god will be a better one which man will bleave has no effect on huemans and will he bleave that the impact on hueman is self made and he will know the god and not pray him like a slave. the day he will understand god is no and never like man. he will not get angry he will not have sympathy he will not have children and he will now even know that we exist( like we never know how many bacterias are in our body and nither we know their names...... ) god ill never punish someone nither does he praise some one because will you praise an ant or will you punish for killnig another ??
2007-04-06 18:41:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by kiru005 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
All creations are effected by a cause. There has to be an uncaused Creator who precedes all causes and creation. He is known as God to the spiritualists and a mass of inifinite and eternal energy to scientists.
The Creator willed for creation to take place proving that He is not merely an energy mass. He is life.
He decided to have a viewpoint of His ceation thus giving rise to space.
Variable particles with differing properties were created allowing the movement of time to be observed through changes experienced by those particles.
God's most beautiful "creation" must be life itself. As He is life, it would not be appropriate to say He created life rather He created invdividualized ego which clouds a living species from perceiving the unity it has with the Creator. The ego allows life to be viewed as individualized and distinct from each other and the universe.
2007-04-06 18:18:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rakesh 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Conservation of Matter Law states that MATTER cannot be created.
What this means is that there is no need to imagine a god to create the universe. Every single piece of evidence we have indicates that the matter/energy of the universe has always existed, and always will. It can be neither created not destroyed.
I know I can't explain it. You can't either! I'm honest enough to admit that I don't know how we came to be about, rather than making up an all powerful imaginary friend to account for it. That would be intellectual dishonesty. I prefer truth, wherever it can be found.
2007-04-06 18:12:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
That's hardly fair. You challenge us to explain something, but you clearly already believe that it is impossible. So no matter what we say, we're automatically wrong in your eyes. But the point is, science isn't about having all the answers and being certain. It's about trying to _find_ the answers, and always being ready to change your belief if something new is found. Just because we aren't sure exactly how the universe or life began doesn't mean a giant beard in the sky did.
2007-04-06 18:09:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
By the same token, it doesn't mean that God didn't do it and a priori dismissing the notion of God is every bit as closed minded as you would say Christians, deists, Muslims and Jews are. By the way, do you have any answer for the Kalam cosmological argument? I have never heard an atheist who could successfully answer even the FIRST of its premises.
Tom
2007-04-06 18:12:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just because you don't understand the explanation, doesn't mean that it isn't a valid hypothesis.
Science has produced valid hypotheses for the creation of the universe, and the formation and evolution of life. And- for each has provided peer reviewed evidence.
Where is the evidence for the hypothesis that god must be in charge of everything that you personally don't understand???
2007-04-06 18:11:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Morey000 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Here is what i don't get they call it "rational thinking" when a cell just popped into existence i find that God putting it there is way more believable that it just randomly being put here. What is more rational?
2007-04-06 18:19:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by JJBP 2
·
0⤊
1⤋