I mean in all of history to date no other "monkey man" "cave man" fishman" have ever been seen.
life reproduces itself, all the time why haven't we seen any kind of specis like that or anything close to it?
I think it's a lie what do you think>
I'm not asking to cause a fight I'm really wondering what you think.
2007-04-06
16:02:03
·
28 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
not fossil alive species, walking around ?
2007-04-06
16:15:47 ·
update #1
choose reality. .your mean, if some dares think different then you you vent? I thought you was a free thinker, but I guesse only free to think what you believe?
2007-04-06
16:20:04 ·
update #2
I really can't believe how nasty some of you are, of course I'm not educated in the subject thats why I asked. I said I didn't want to start a fight, am I not allowed to think even if I'm wrong or right i should be alowed to think.
just my "therory" why don't we see any "new" "alive"evolving creatures?
2007-04-06
16:26:06 ·
update #3
if nothing else this question taught me one thing, not everyone who claims to be open minded are, it's their way or your a moron,
to all the intelligent people who took the time to answer my question Thank You.
To the hateful filthy mouthed angry people, I'll pray for you you must be very sad.
I thought thats what Y/A was for to see others opions.
and thanks for them even if I don't agree or you don't agree with me, thank for your time and I will read up on the subject.
2007-04-07
13:08:12 ·
update #4
Its not true. There is no fossils with an intermediate form. With all the millions of fossils not one. Its non sense. Peace out.....
2007-04-06 16:10:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by powerliftingrules 5
·
3⤊
7⤋
Every living thing on earth including plants have the evidence of being transformed from one shape to another adopting to the environments he lives in. The same kind of fish may look different from different places for survival. And so is man of the Ancient times. Go to a remote area where modern civilization is absent, look at how they walk, stand and do their daily tasks. Take one their youngest children who is a toddler. Bring him up to a city life and when he grows observe how he walk, stand and do his daily tasks.
Ancient men live inside the jungle and took the trees for their homes and get their nutrition from the fruit of the trees. What shape and form of men are you expecting to see? Even the construction of his body must be built according to what he can do to survive competing with the monkeys and other tree animals.
Observe those who went out and learn to plow the fields and live on caves and houses in flat lands. Notice their difference.
They do not act like monkeys anymore because they no longer climb the trees and swing from branch to branch. Their body shapes are better. They also learn how to run. Isn't it they began to be called "homo erectus"? because of their new erect standing?
Coming from the Monkey may not be exactly true but having all shapes and form like a monkey may have given the scientist a theory that we came from the apes. Our shape and form in these generation may also change as we go to the future depending what part of our body we will be using predominantly. This age we are using our hands, feet, brains and every limbs we have. Next time it may only take our brain to have everything done and by that we may possess small bodies with larger heads. That is what I think. Darwin's theory is not a lie, he may just run short of thinking that man evolves not from being an animal but from an undeveloped brains to an advance state of life. Our thinking are the ones that keep us change and develop our bodies.
2007-04-06 16:34:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Rallie Florencio C 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Evolutionary development does not move in a ladder formation.
Each population of organisms are affected by different selection pressures. There's no universal push towards intelligence and human form.
If your talking about common ancestral fossils between current humans and other primates, there are plenty existing and documented.
2007-04-06 16:16:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by eigelhorn 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Darwin's Theory is clearly true and proving it is easy and straight forward. Micro - organisms constantly evolve in response to the antibiotics we use to try to kill them.
As a result of this constant evolution different and better drugs need to be developed .That is definitive proof of evolution in real time.
2007-04-06 16:29:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because the theory states changes over millions of years, and we've only been observing nature scientifically for but a few hundreds years, at least in that sense.
In other words, we only just noticed a process that has been going on slowly for several hundred million years.
2007-04-06 16:07:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by dave 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
You just missed a bunch of "apemen" in Africa. They were here about 4 million years ago.
We've actually seen new species form.
2007-04-06 16:12:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by novangelis 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
You need to do more research about evolution.
Think about who is more likely to be right, scientists or ministers.
In the last 200 years, what has religion done to help us understand the universe we live in? Now compare that to the knowledge we have obtained through the scientific process.
Hmm.
2007-04-06 16:16:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mom 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
It is all depended on nature, if you always expect that to happen, we would have had superman, batman, spiderman and all kinds of odd people running around, Nature takes it time, and what it does is always right, and always right for the world, that is why we call it "Mother" Nature, because a "Mother" does whatever is right for it's kids!
2007-04-06 16:07:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by KÖoÌSÍÄy€r5 - "S" 4 SÍ 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Have you never seen a picture of George W. Bush??
2007-04-06 17:31:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Shayna 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Survival of the fittest meant that one group had to die off. Cave man couldn't compete against modern man so they just perished.
2007-04-06 16:07:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by shrabikhababi 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
because we evolved into them, there have been skeletons recovered of humans that looked an awful lot like the bone structure of modern day monkeys.
2007-04-06 16:13:06
·
answer #11
·
answered by demolitionlover13 2
·
2⤊
1⤋