2007-04-06 14:13:17 · 12 answers · asked by hazydaze 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Socrates would imagine that the world should advance far more since history of his own philosophy. I think he would be surprised that we are still lost in the allusion of the concept of the super God much like the Greeks thought. In the centuries have passed since he was alive, I'm sure you wouldn't believe that we would've advanced more.
2007-04-14 14:07:40 · answer #1 · answered by Boston Bluefish 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
both Greece and Rome made substantial contributions to Western civilization. Greek comprehend-how became ascendant in philosophy, physics, chemistry, drugs, and arithmetic for almost 2 thousand years. The Romans did no longer have the Greek temperament for philosophy and technology, yet that they had a genius for regulation and civil administration. The Romans were also tremendous engineers and builders. They invented concrete, perfected the arch, and built roads and bridges that proceed to be in use on the instant. yet neither the Greeks nor the Romans had a lot appreciation for technologies. The technological society that switched over the international became conceived by technique of Europeans in the course of the middle a lengthy time period.
2016-12-03 10:21:19 · answer #2 · answered by turnbough 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He'd merely sigh at the ignorance of the world. Were all people yet we live as if devided by religion and culture. We all human, were all people.
Were not all christians,muslims,jews,pagans, etc. were all...people. simple and sweet.
2007-04-06 14:32:18 · answer #3 · answered by DrewM 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I did not know him personally. I don't think I could take the responsibility of making that choice for him. However, I know my own opinion. My opinion is that everybody has a religion that will bring them inner peace. Your religion does not matter, as long as it makes you happy and encourages you to do good.
2007-04-06 14:17:58 · answer #4 · answered by Elerth Morrow ™ 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I didn't know him personally....what he wrote may have been for the masses but not what he truly felt inside. It's only a guess as to what he would think.
2007-04-06 14:17:25 · answer #5 · answered by Greenwood 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He would probably care less because he was logical. Then again he would probably wonder why.
2007-04-06 14:21:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brain-dead sheep!
2007-04-06 14:18:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
He'd let out a horse laugh.
2007-04-06 14:16:37 · answer #8 · answered by S K 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I thought he liked little boys
2007-04-06 14:16:10 · answer #9 · answered by Gypsy Gal 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
He's probably rolling over in his grave...
2007-04-06 14:17:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋