English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-04-06 14:11:37 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

To Laughing,
My point is why even give them weapons if they're not going to use them? Weren't they trained on the use of military force? What happened to only giving name, rank and serial number when captured? I believe they were absolute wimps, and Iran has gotten a victory over this.

2007-04-06 14:21:41 · update #1

7 answers

In short, yes.

Kissing the ring was a classic "European" response to the Muslim invaders. Also notice the rest of the European Allies and the UN had no response to the Iranians show of aggression, let alone condemning the acts. Anyone that thinks leaving Iran alone, and they won't bother us; is sadly mistaken.

Hey, let's give Iran Nukes for peace !!!

2007-04-06 14:26:36 · answer #1 · answered by Albert F 5 · 0 1

You play the role as Hostage in Iran for a week and then deliver judgement... Man, will you guys step out of the MATRIX for a little bit and get some fresh air.

2007-04-06 21:17:57 · answer #2 · answered by Laughing Man Copycat 5 · 2 0

First i do not think that they were supposed to hover over Iran and enter their country without Iran's permission. secondly, if they were to use weapons the en tier world will be against them , the Brits are not in a state of war against Iran. third of all , what you should be asking in my opinion , is that what do we think of how Iran handled the situation? which i think , was the best way ever done by a notorious leader known for his gang ho behavior. this time he proved to be sane ...

2007-04-06 21:31:20 · answer #3 · answered by interested 4 · 1 1

No, they did not.. they did what they had to do to stay alive. Which one of you heroes would have done differently.

Makes me sick when I see on here and in the media that they should have refused to say what they were told.. life is too precious. Believe me, there isn't one of us on here who would have done any differently... and there are no world leaders who would have either.

Hell,. Bush would have surrendered the U.S. to them.. we know what a chicken s**t he is.

2007-04-06 21:19:13 · answer #4 · answered by Debra H 7 · 2 0

While their behavior certainly appears suspect from our perspective, I won't judge the situation since I wasn't there. War is hell.

2007-04-06 21:18:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

the tone and content of your question are utterly preposterous.

2007-04-06 21:21:59 · answer #6 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 0 0

No !

2007-04-06 21:17:22 · answer #7 · answered by Norskeyenta 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers