Since many of you want the U.S. out of Iraq.
2007-04-06 10:04:25 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hey! I'm not hearing from that many.Are
you hiding?
2007-04-09 07:00:08 · update #1
No. I would however support a Coalition (Including the US) approved by the U.N. to help end the genocide in Darfur. We should never have gone to Iraq, they did not ask us to come over (as have the people of Darfur), and Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 (The reason given for invading). Our invasion of Iraq was not approved by the U.N. and the Iraqi people do NOT want us there. Going to Darfur would be a more worthy cause.
2007-04-06 10:20:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, not an invasion. Perhaps a greater degree of humanitarian aid- you know, some sign that we actually give a **** about things like genocide, which you clearly don't. None of the reasons given for going to war in Iraq have panned out, NONE. There were no WMD, there was no link between Iraq and 9/11, there was no "grave and gathering threat", and everyone knows that the REAL hotbed of terrorist activity is our "ally", Saudi Arabia. By the way: over 70% of Americans are against the war. Are those people all liberals?
2007-04-06 17:25:56 · answer #2 · answered by David 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah and you could get a left wing news broadcaster with all his vanity to stand on shore in his jungle outfit looking good like Rambo with his sleeves all rolled up and pointing out to the cameras exactly how the marines are coming ashore and that would be what? reality? or a bunch of commie BS?
2007-04-11 13:36:22 · answer #3 · answered by puddog57 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yea i'd support it i think we need to sort some crap out here at home and this b.s. thats going on over there now first but in 3-4 years after the dems cleaned up your mess i'm all for it
2007-04-06 17:10:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
yup!
darfur would be a twofer - we would be able to stop the next rwanda from happening and fight arabs (many from saudi arabia i am told) at the same time.
imagine all the worldwide goodwill we would generate by doing this - and being able to freaking thrash the arabs doing the killing at the same time.
i love the idea - good thinking!!
2007-04-06 17:07:14 · answer #5 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
yup... at least the US would be doing something that is making a differance... actually helping people...BUT heck theres no money in that so Bush wont bother!!
2007-04-06 17:20:37 · answer #6 · answered by lisa baby... 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
well I guess since people like you also seem to talk for us, why don't you make that decision.
if you go, I'll go.
I don't want us out of Iraq. I'm pizzed at Bush because he didn't allow the troops to totally destroy that place.
2007-04-06 17:10:10 · answer #7 · answered by Doctor Pain 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
lol, yes, I think they would.
Go figure.
(lol, this one always gets me!)
David, when did Saddam tell you he was out of the genocide business? You seem to have inside information.
2007-04-06 17:13:20 · answer #8 · answered by tttplttttt 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
If it was legal I would. By "legal", of course I mean not violating the UN Charter.
2007-04-06 17:08:59 · answer #9 · answered by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Hell nooo!!! are you kidding me?
the only invasion they would support
is any country invading us.
2007-04-06 17:14:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋