he blamed God for not passing his science test!! so he got angry at God, and he invented that theory of evolution to misled the word of God!, but did you know he was christian!!
and he took the evolution Idea from the Bible! oh well he did a great job!
2007-04-06 08:13:28 · 29 answers · asked by Not Of This World 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Your right he was...
He turned his back on God when his daughter died.
He did not take his theory from the Bible...!
2007-04-06 08:17:39 · answer #1 · answered by rockinweazel 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋
"and he invented that theory of evolution to misled the word of God!,"
Is that even proper english; Anyway, if I take it as a statement that Darwins Theory was to be Deliberately Misleading, my question is, where is the proof that he did this?
And, Most Evolutionary Theory is not Darwinian anyway; So what a case of another "Straw man" argument( With a Good Dose of an "ad hominem" attack thrown in ).
2007-04-06 15:28:19 · answer #2 · answered by Mictlan_KISS 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've always stated that I believe that the most creative, logical way for God to create the universe is through a process like the big bang, and the best way to promote life on earth is through evolution. I personally believe that God, (whoever that may be), and science walk hand in hand, and it is only our lack of understanding and ignorance that keep us from seeing this.
2007-04-06 15:19:39 · answer #3 · answered by Chris E 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think you have been misled. There is a theory that he did not publish the Origin of the Species for so long because he was a christian and was afraid to do so. However, recent findings have indicated that his letters (which were not previously thoroughly looked at) have not substantially shown this.
2007-04-06 15:18:23 · answer #4 · answered by the_emrod 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Darwin was indeed a Christian and a student of theology.
However, he did not come with the concept of evolution as an active defiance of god. In fact Darwin didn't come up with the idea evolution at all.
Darwin's contribution was his discovery of the process of variation, inheritance, and natural selection.
Stop spreading lies.
2007-04-06 15:23:06 · answer #5 · answered by Ben 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not that it matters. The fact remains the evolution has been following the scientific method and hasn't failed yet. Your god however has no scientific proof. I don't care what religion the people who make great idea's come from, the fact that the idea's work is what matters.
2007-04-06 15:19:03 · answer #6 · answered by Magus 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Part of this is true, and part not. Darwin was educated in Christian theology, but the evolution idea did not come from the bible as it does not exist there.
2007-04-06 15:19:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Wow I am glad I got wadders on.
That much dung can't even be called a joke.
Grow up !!! There is nothing that Darwin said or printed that has any denial of God.
You don't seem to see the Truth.
2007-04-06 15:23:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Charles Darwin was Agnostic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin
2007-04-06 15:23:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I'd like to report you for being misleading, but I guess you're allowed.
Cut and pasted...
From the age of forty he was, to use his own words, a complete dis-believer in Christianity. He professed himself an Agnostic, regarding the problem of the universe as beyond our solution, "For myself," he wrote, "I do not believe in any revelation. As for a future life, every man must judge for himself between conflicting vague probabilities."
"The mystery of the beginning of all things is insoluble by us, and I for one must be content to remain an agnostic."
"It appears to me (whether rightly or wrongly) that direct arguments against christianity and theism produce hardly any effect on the public; and freedom of thought is best promoted by the gradual illumination of men's minds which follows from the advance of science." [Quoted in How We Believe: The Search for God in an Age of Science by Michael Shermer.
Charles Robert Darwin, English naturalist (1809-1882).
2007-04-06 15:19:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't know where you got your ideas; but Rockinwe, though overly critical, is near the real point here.
It seems to me the real dividing line always rests in what one finds, or doesn't find, when they face death.
Evolution really has nothing to say about how life came to be. It has much to say about how life progressed and in the end it answers only to death; saying that death is natural.
Evolution answers to death and to reason, but not to the heart of man. To the heart, reason offers only rationalization; and reason, in the face of what is basic to humanity, becomes its own delusion.
2007-04-06 16:08:37 · answer #11 · answered by Tommy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋