Bait for breakfast, anyone?
2007-04-06 02:31:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by glitterkittyy 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Not as a whole course in science. Teachers should also teach the proof--such as the 2nd law on thermodynamics, etc the logic-- behind creationism so that students are made to choose, rather than brain washed one way or the other.
Here is the logic behind Creation.
Premise 1. Outputs = Inputs + process
Premise 2. For premise 1 to come about someone has to have the resources and power to do the process. Let him be called the Great Cause.
Premise 3. For every rule there is an exception.
Premise 4. The rule on exception can not be applied to any of the components on Premise 1 because it would be non-sense.
Premise 5. The rule on exception must therefore be applied to premise 2.
Conclusion: Therefore, the Great Cause ( the one w/ resources and sufficient might) was the one who caused Premise 1. Further He was not subject to Premise 1 by reason of premise 3.
2007-04-06 09:36:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Yes, I'd love that.
You people who don't want to teach Creationism have a double standard
1. Creationsm isn't taught because it would be terrible for people to have to learn about it. Why is it ok for Christians, Muslims, Jews and everyone else who doesn't believe in it to have to learn about it? There are about 1 to fourteen percent of Americans that are atheists. Yet, atheists are the minority still even if there are fourteen percent so why do we have to listen to them but they don't have to listen to us?
2.Creationism can't be taught because it is religion. However, evolution can also be seen as religion. http://www.creationists.org/evolutionisreligion.html
3. showing the proof for evolution but not allowing the proof against it to be shown. http://www.evolutionisimpossible.com/
2007-04-06 12:46:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Me Encanta Espanol 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Hee hee hee
Asyong is doing what Kallan was talking about here:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ao6hoL2PyEmN7y7vfaQlDR88.Bd.?qid=20070405171650AAdCJ2a
*****
No, I don't think that "creationism" should be taught in public schools - not as science, in any case.. What is taught in private schools is no concern of mine (since my taxes don't pay for it), so if they want to teach that, the only people who will suffer will be the kids, if they want to attend a non-religious institution of higher education.
2007-04-06 11:08:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Praise Singer 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Not unless they also teach the stork theory of human sexual reproduction in sex education class and the flat earth theory in geology.
Seriously: Of course not. Creationism is not a science it is a bad joke.
2007-04-06 09:38:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Well, no, because it isn't science. Creationism is a religious belief, so the only place it belongs is in RE with all the other origin myths.
2007-04-06 09:29:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
1⤋
Only if they teach it as a "This is what happens when you try to verify a religion with Pop science" class.
2007-04-06 10:44:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Black Dragon 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Nope. That would be infringing on the rights of others because not everyone feels that creationism is real. Besides creationism isn't exactly scientific now is it?
2007-04-06 09:29:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
no. It isn't a science. It is based on religious beliefs, and most religions have different thoeires about the origin of the world, etc.
2007-04-06 09:37:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by country_girl 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Creationsm is real science. Darwin theorized that the varieties of life forms gradually evolved from one another over a great span of time. The Vedas, however, explicitly describe the process by which all species were created at the beginning of the universe. The Vedas categorize 900,000 species of aquatic life, 2,000,000 species of plant and tree life, 1,100,000 species of insects, 1,000,000 species of birds, 3,000,000 species of beasts and 400,000 species of human beings. The Vedas do not say that all 8,400,000 species of life must exist simultaneously on any one planet. There are countless millions of planets within God's creation, each with life forms suitable for its environment. Simply because a particular species—such as the dinosaur—is no longer visible on earth is no proof that it does not exist somewhere else.
2007-04-06 09:32:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
5⤋
Should give them all our creator's universal gifts of life vital for their own survival and advancement of themselves in planet of apes.
With time after graduating from school.
They should try and continue it own their own in finding their way back to our creator before hitting their expiry date due in planet of apes.
Will learn to know that life is worth living for with the joys out there in planet of apes.
Not just came and passing-by serving no good purpose for the good of mankind in planet of apes.
2007-04-06 09:34:02
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋