The same can be said right back to you. How can you deny God, the creator of ALL things. If one would actual sit down and read the Bible, they would know without a doubt that it is God's words!!!!!
2007-04-05 15:43:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by GraycieLee 6
·
2⤊
6⤋
OK, here is the thing for me, the primary reason why I deny evolution. Evolution could only have happened in a total natural non supernatural world. That is if the cosmos can be explained without supernatural intervention. That being the case, based on the laws of thermodynamics, the cosmos could not have existed forever, all energy would be depleted. If the cosmos did not exist forever, then they had to spontaneously generate from nothing/nothing, no matter no energy no catalyst which top evolutionary scientist admit is impossible.
Lastly, there could not have been an eternity past because we could never have gotten here if there was. Therefore Time is imaginary and only started when there was matter. God, who exists outside of time in another dimension, created the matter and that is when time started. Its the only logical solution. Any other view of time makes no sense.
2007-04-06 14:03:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by 10 Point Shoe-In 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
People deny things all the time, based on "facts" that they only think they know.
I come in here sometimes to talk about magic (not Harry Potter magic, but the art of using your thoughts to change physical reality) and get attacked by atheists and Christians alike. No one ever bothers to do their research. If they did they'd understand that "magic" in that sense is a scientific reality.
You'd be surprised at what people think they know that is just plain false. I'm including pseudointellectual atheists here as well. People who claim their beliefs are based on "logic and science" are often just as wrong as those who claim their beliefs are based on ancient myth. These are all the same people who think nothing can move faster than the speed of light (it can) or that Christ was an actual historical figure (never been proven). They learned their science and history in high school and college and haven't done a moment of research since.
2007-04-05 15:48:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Huddy 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Stupidity. It relies upon on what you call 'info' nevertheless. yet i will signify you're speaking approximately some theists denying evolution. forget the notice for it however the only that in certainty ability they do no longer go with to income by using fact of such and such.
2016-11-26 21:47:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
---I have been a teacher for over 47 years, & LOVE the true sciences! Evolution is a fraudulent science!
---Even before I was a JW for 40 yrs. I found evolution never made sense even , in my college life-- anthropology, biology, chemistry, geology, physics , astronomy---shall I go on & on or should we let the scientists do that, THAT'S a better idea:
*** ce chap. 2 p. 16 pars. 7-9 Disagreements About Evolution—Why? ***
7 A London Times writer, Christopher Booker (who accepts evolution), said this about it: “It was a beautifully simple and attractive theory. The only trouble was that, as Darwin was himself at least partly aware, it was full of colossal holes.” Regarding Darwin’s Origin of Species, he observed: “We have here the supreme irony that a book which has become famous for explaining the origin of species in fact does nothing of the kind.”—Italics added.
8 Booker also stated: “A century after Darwin’s death, we still have not the slightest demonstrable or even plausible idea of how evolution really took place—and in recent years this has led to an extraordinary series of battles over the whole question. . . . a state of almost open war exists among the evolutionists themselves, with every kind of [evolutionary] sect urging some new modification.” He concluded: “As to how and why it really happened, we have not the slightest idea and probably never shall.”5
9 Evolutionist Hitching agreed, saying: “Feuds concerning the theory of evolution exploded . . . Entrenched positions, for and against, were established in high places, and insults lobbed like mortar bombs from either side.” He said that it is an academic dispute of far-reaching proportions, “potentially one of those times in science when, quite suddenly, a long-held idea is overthrown by the weight of contrary evidence and a new one takes its place.”6 And Britain’s New Scientist observed that “an increasing number of scientists, most particularly a growing number of evolutionists . . . argue that Darwinian evolutionary theory is no genuine scientific theory at all. . . . Many of the critics have the highest intellectual credentials.”7
--WHERE OH WHERE are those thousands of important bones or are there just......A COFFIN FULL?
Science Digest: “The remarkable fact is that all the physical evidence we have for human evolution can still be placed, with room to spare, inside a SINGLE COFFIN(my caps) . . . Modern apes, for instance, seem to have sprung out of nowhere. They have no yesterday, no fossil record. And the true origin of modern humans—of upright, naked, toolmaking, big-brained beings—is, if we are to be honest with ourselves, an equally mysterious matter.”12
9 Just how sparse is the fossil record regarding “ape-men”? Note the following. Newsweek: “‘You could put ALL the fossils on the top of a single desk,’ said Elwyn Simons of Duke University
--TRY reading up to date material before you make such sweeping statements!
--No a person practicing the Christianity of Christ cannot believe in evolution, TOTALLY against his teachings!
2007-04-05 15:52:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by THA 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
I've never liked this 'evolutionists v creationists' scenario. I don't know where it came from and I don't like it. Because it's used by both sides to batter each other with and doesn't get anyone any nearer the truth. There are a great many holes in both theories, and putting theory upon theory to prove a theory is a backward step in any civilised society who only want to know the truth/facts.
2007-04-05 16:03:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
every day they are finding different branches of mankind; what you thought today may change tomorrow; you can't lick, smell or taste a planet but you believe; you can't make a non-believer believe; but you have no problem believing the evolution theory that is taught, changed, reinvented and when was the last time you were at the dig to view the scientific evidence yourself, you set your mind to believe the set of truths you call truths for yourself .... God gave you the gift of free choice, how you choose to spend it is your business - it is your choice;if you have an open heart, truly open heart , like your mind is to science , you may let God in ; right now the only thing that is keeping him out , a mystery to you is YOU by choice
2007-04-05 15:48:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by sml 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Sweetheart, for all your talk of not reading, apparently you're not doing your homework, either. Go to www.giveshare.org, and read pages 6-20 the comments of emminent scientists AND evolutionists who are defecting from the evolution camp. I have read books on earth and space science, evolution, chemistry, biology, archaeology, on and on. I really must concur that evolution makes no sense. Apparently, there are many in the scientific community who think so, too.
2007-04-05 15:47:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by vox populi 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
You have to understand, everyone developes their ability to see the truth in their own stages of development. Most of us who believe we are coming into the truth have only but scratched the surface. You cannot and will not convince anyone to see the truth. We all find out on our own by taking the initiative to search for it. It's best to not worry about how others' perceive the truth. People will come to it in their own time. I don't prefer to be called an evolutionist or an atheist but rather a seeker of truth. But, people will say what they will and I could care less. I stopped trying to understand why people do and say the things they do. I find that it only puts me further into confusion and frustration. I concern myself with me and my family.
2007-04-05 16:05:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Maureen B 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
1st... Thank you for: "People aren't called evolutionists that is just dumb." This was loooong overdue.
AISI, the long and short answer is... "indoctrination". Brain-washing at the appropriate age, for a long enough time and with sufficient frequency and strength, and anything can seem like fact to the victims - they'll do anything to protect their truths.
2007-04-05 15:49:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I don't deny fossils - just the conclusions reached by many scientists concerning those fossils. I would gladly exchange a bit of information with you in more detail than this forum will allow. Consider dropping me an email at thomas_e_lafferty@yahoo.com
2007-04-05 15:42:21
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋