The in both statements see
THE chicken, THE egg....
Are u simple minded?
2007-04-05 15:39:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chris 3
·
1⤊
5⤋
The chicken did because Noah took a chicken on the Ark, not an egg.
2007-04-05 23:00:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Freedom 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
The egg, because before there were chickens, there was fish and other sea life(that eventually evolved into land animals), who had eggs.
2007-04-05 22:45:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mr. MustKnow 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
In contrast to the first answer, it is in fact "the egg" came first followed by "the chicken", as written in the sentence.
2007-04-05 22:41:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by wombatusium 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
the egg. The animal that the chicken evolved from was not fully chicken, but eventually evolved to that point. This means that at some point a chicken-LIKE animal laid an egg that was fully chicken.
2007-04-05 22:39:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
since an egg cannot "come", the chicken "came" first.
2007-04-05 22:43:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
million years old question......The fact is God created animals by its kind not an egg, so the chicken came first. Promise by Harvard from Qatar Airways.
2007-04-05 22:41:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Harvard 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
The chicken,silly,somebody had to hatch the egg.
Now where the chicken came from?....only God knows.
2007-04-05 22:42:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by bonsai bobby 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
the single celled organism came first.
2007-04-05 22:42:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Armund Steel 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Chicken.God created it. He made all.Humans,Dirt,and yes chirckens!
2007-04-05 23:33:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Any 2
·
0⤊
0⤋