English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1. Bush run out of money to wage another war?
2. Blair, Bush, Rice, Rove, Cheney and Rumsfeld kept quit?
3. Civilized behavior on each side?
4. The american/english public tired of military spin?
5. Haliburton has already to much contracts?
6. Lookheed is sold out for the next ten years with weapons?
7. The Pentagon wasn't fast enough to blow it out of proportion?
8. Rove and Cheney grew a conscience?

2007-04-05 07:18:00 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

5 answers

TROLL ALERT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2007-04-05 10:22:48 · answer #1 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 0 0

IF u.s. or England have been as efficient as they're deluded to be, Iran could have been dealt with before. yet those days ended years in the past...because of fact the Iraq fiasco shows. Iran has been loading up on severe tech weapons from Russia and eastern Europe and Russian help for over 15 years now. you in ordinary terms examine what the U. S. needs you to be attentive to interior the U. S.. The Iranians supposedly presented the Iraqi insurgents with "weapons". How else did the "insurgents" get a weapon which could truthfully injury an Abrams tank? Do you think of the Iranians or "insurgents" greater it on my own?

2016-10-21 02:53:14 · answer #2 · answered by Erika 4 · 0 0

An Iranian diplomat, Jalal Sharafi, that was held in Iraq, for training and supplying weapons to the militias, was traded for the hostages. Blair would have released Osama Bin Ladin if it got those guys back.

2007-04-05 09:15:39 · answer #3 · answered by gregory_dittman 7 · 0 0

It was a preplanned manuver on the part of the Iranians.

They were to capture a group of hostiles, either UK or American, treat them well, show them the smiling and kind face of the Iranian president, and then after a bit of suspense, release them.

The freed hostages were then to go home and tell the press, "Hey, we were well treated and forgiven by the Iranians. They aren't so bad after all!"

Then the people of the world were supposed to shake their heads in wonder and say, "Hey, the Iranians aren't so bad after all!"

2007-04-05 07:27:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

None of the above, of course. They are all very silly answers. The whole idea was to make England look bad as well as your country. The mistake was not going into Iran and rescuing these captives. Remember--you do not and can not ever, under any circimstance, negotiate with the person or persons who are trying to kill. Only liberals think otherwise.

2007-04-05 07:32:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers