English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In Sodom & Gomorrah ---- If the city was that wicked with lust, surely there were some pregnant women in the city.

Or had the fetuses already sinned?

The Bible said that NO righteous people (other than Lot) existed in the city, either fetuses had sinned, or God doesn't consider fetuses "people". One or the other.

2007-04-05 05:33:50 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

7 answers

What the talking *** said...LOL just wanted to say that.

I bet the "argument" is that they were all sodomites (or gomorrites?) so there can't have been any pregnant women.

2007-04-05 05:47:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

All humans are stained by the original sin of our first parents, from the moment of their conception.

The proof of this is the fact that fetuses and babies can die, and death is the penalty for sin.

One who has no sin is not liable to die, so if babies were truly "sinless" as you seem to think, than they should not be subject to death.

2007-04-05 06:25:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

How can Christians claim that abortion is against god? God aborted her first few attempts to create mankind. Those earlier, aborted versions must really have been major failures if the most recent version of mankind is to finally be considered a "successful" creation.

2007-04-05 05:54:00 · answer #3 · answered by Fred 7 · 0 0

Nearly half of all pregnancies spontaneously abort, most in the first month with women who do not even realize their egg had been fertilized. Since this makes God the champion abortionist of all time one can only conclude that God does approve.

2007-04-05 05:49:19 · answer #4 · answered by Dendronbat Crocoduck 6 · 2 0

The question was asked by Abraham, "Will God destroy the righteous with the wicked?" Hence Abraham was able to spare Lot and his family.

Sodom & Gomorrah was inundated with homosexuality. There were no pregnancies present.

2007-04-05 05:48:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

No he does not but at that time there would have been no way to save the unborn babys.

2007-04-05 05:46:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

That would seem to be the case.

2007-04-05 05:45:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers