The number of 9/11 Nut-jobs, Kooks, and Wing-Nuts are increasing at an alarming rate.
Why do the bush administration tolerate these “outrageous conspiracy theories” concerning the events of 9/11, malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves away from the guilty? Making an example of a “Kook” such as David Ray Griffin in a court of law would certainly stem the flood, don’t you think?
2007-04-05 04:57:03 · 19 answers · asked by lghs 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The neo-cons are too busy bungling the war effort to even address the lies they perpetrated on the american people. Don't forget that they all believe in the imaginary man... maybe not the same one, but they still believe.
2007-04-05 05:04:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The fact that the conspiracy nutjobs are out there running around is just more proof that there is no conspiracy.
If the government can magically pull off a conspiracy on the scale of 9/11, they could easily make a couple of pseudo-scientists disappear.
2007-04-05 05:04:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
it really is Freedom of Speech. human beings can arise with any theory or theory they choose and throw it into the ring with all the different ideas and theories. it really is as a lot as human beings to make up their own minds which theory they choose have self assurance. no man or woman ever asks authorities to be tolerant of what the individuals say. the individuals have a suitable to assert what they'll. in the united states it says so in the structure, or is it the invoice of Rights? besides, freedom of speech is enshrined in regulation. the following in uk freedom of speech is enshrined in English undemanding regulation and has been so because the middle a lengthy time period - difficult to have self assurance i comprehend, exceptionally because you'd be hanged drawn and quartered for being a traitor. yet declaring blah about the King down the pub isn't being a traitor. no man or woman is going to take heed to you besides. Edit: if a authorities in a democracy does compared to what the all and sundry is declaring about an adventure, all it choose ever do is submit the authentic data they have on document. end of argument. because the gov gained't try this, the theories will proceed to abound and lengthy would it not really is so.
2016-12-03 08:14:08 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Why not imprison anyone who expresses an opinion that doesn't tally with the state's given view?
Just think of all the lies that would go unchallenged. You could live in a modern day version of Nazi Germany or Communist Russia.
Great Idea!
2007-04-05 05:01:31 · answer #4 · answered by The Oak 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I am not a big fan of what you have to say, how 'bout we make an example out of you? Freedom of speech is for everyone, you cannot pick and choose who has it and who doesn't. For now anyway. Fairly soon, no one will be able to say anything at all without being arrested. Enjoy it while you can.
2007-04-05 05:43:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
you should prosecute politicians and FBI and CIA.
look at this facts:
World Trade Center towers were the first tall buildings that ever collapsed because of the fire.
in 50´s a B-52 bomber crashed into the Empire State building in a fog. Empire was burning a lot more longer than WTC and it still stands today.
who will you believe and support????
and those are just theories. like theory of evolution is just like a conspiracy that God didnt created us.
2007-04-05 05:06:40 · answer #6 · answered by bitch 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The government loves conspiracy theories because they tend to make people not believe stories involving government wrongdoings and cover ups
2007-04-05 05:02:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Paranoia is not a crime. And if they didn't learn anything from Y2K, making an example of Griffin won't teach them either. They'll just say the gov. was trying to shut him up for telling the truth.
2007-04-05 05:00:30 · answer #8 · answered by Rossonero NorCal SFECU 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
You and people like you give George Bush and the Right a bad name.
2007-04-05 05:01:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anthony F 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because we have freedom of speech here.
In America, conspiricy theorists (like Rosie O'Donnel and her "never has fire melted steel!" diatribe) have the right to be wrong in public.
2007-04-05 05:01:24 · answer #10 · answered by Suzanne: YPA 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋