Are heterosexuals ruining the institution of marriage?

Question

The divorce rate is over 50%...this has nothing to do with gay people...so, isn't the institution of marriage already ruined?

Should we enact laws to make it more difficult for people to receive a divorce?

Should we require, yes require, that people take classes before entering into the institution of marriage...

Is it right to be able to get married on a whim in Las Vegas or wherever?

Where is the Godliness in this?

Fred,

You are a frightful person. You speak as if you are God...

Fred,

Are you being literal or tongue-in-cheek?

Answer 1

Of course they are.

And Las Vegas is the greatest city on the planet.

Answer 2

The heterosexuals valuable are not' retaining marriage sacred. it incredibly is between the BS argument against gay marriage is that it will ruin the sanctity. If marriage is so sacred we does not have a divorce fee of fifty%. training required. NO. Getting married in Las Vegas is advantageous. there is no correlation interior the divorce fee and getting married in Las Vegas. confident gays could desire to be allowed to marry. i understand 3 gay couples that have been mutually for each approximately 25 years, alot longer than maximum marriages. the biggest project with marriages are money and childrens. no person has the middle to do a locate out approximately how childrens reason many divorces. Many couples go from being unmarried to getting married and then have childrens suitable away. it incredibly is a confusing transition from residing on my own or including your dad and mom to residing with somebody finished time. then upload childrens and there is an entire different measurement. i think of if couples spent extra time in the previous having childrens, getting to grasp the thank you to be a pair and taking area in that think approximately the previous having childrens, there could be much less divorces. as quickly as a childrens arrives each and every thing ought to be in regards to the youngster. That leaves little or no time and money for the couple. i could desire to flow into extra element in this yet you get the factor.

Answer 3

The number 1 problem facing the world today is homosexuals destroying the institution of marriage. I know what you are trying to do. You are trying to introduce logic into the equation in an attempt to get the righteous christians to lose focus. Well, it won't work. Homosexuals are trying to destroy the world by desiring equal rights. How dare you mention that all of the primary Republican candidates, except Romney, have been divorced multiple times as being somehow hypocritical? The blame for all their divorces is clearly the attempt to destroy the sacred institution of marriage by homosexuals.

Answer 4

I think that the reason so many people are getting a divorce in this country is because they do not know what the meaning of love is. They think it all has to do with feelings and forget that committment also plays a role in love.
Having some form of a premarital class would not be a bad idea. Many churches require it before they can get married in the church.

Answer 5

Yes, I think there should be steep penalties for divorce except in the cases of infidelity or domestic violence.

I think that no-fault divorce should be abolished entirely.

There is this strange little part of the ceremony for most, "until death do us part..." And silly me, I thought that this was uttered in the form of a witnessed verbal contract.

The worst part is, it's Protestants in this country who have the highest divorce rates. So anyone who claims marriage remains a 'sacred' thing isn't paying attention.

All this and I'm an atheist... makes you wonder where these "marriage is sacred" hypocrites get off telling the rest of us how to live based on their definition of marriage.

Answer 6

Personally, I don't care if 2 consenting adults want to get married. They can marry a horse for all I care. But I do agree with enacting laws to make it more difficult for people to receive a divorce.... especially those people who are in a religion where their own Savior tells them not to get one. If they wish to continue pushing their religious "laws" into our Secular Gov't, then they should go all the way with it. They want to make sure everyone follows their God's laws (even though most claim their God gives us freewill, they wish to take it away), then they should have to follow them FIRST... since they follow that God.

Sorry for the rant. The hypocricy of this is astounding!

Answer 7

I think PEOPLE are ruining the institution of marriage.

It seems to be like high school--you meet someone, you get to know them, like them, go out with them, not like the so much, and break up. Except it seems as soon as you graduate, you are given the license to make your relationships binding and legal, and often children are brought into the mix. Bodies have matured but the individual hasn't.

Gay, bi, straight, I'm sure we have all seen it.

I think courses would be helpful--maybe some courses on how to deal with fights, paying bills, basic homecare and childcare, as well as some courses on the human body--I'm not talking about sex here, but how a woman's body changes when she becomes pregnant and how a man is affected sexually as he ages--things that will help couples cope.

And I think parenting classes should be a requirement.

Answer 8

In all actuality, marriage is a violation of the constitution. Where is the separation of church and state when your tax rates differ depending on whether you have had this religious ceremony?

My wife and I are married for logical reasons that have nothing to do with your religion. So "Godliness" doesn't factor in, and laws definitely should not be made based upon religious views.

Answer 9

If marriage is a church institution, there should be no govenrment involvement.

Make everyone who wants the civil benefits of marriage enter a civil contract and leave deciding who can marry or not to the churches and other religious groups.

That heterosexuals treat marriage like so many wasted bits of kleenex is painful to those of us whose churches have married us but whose governments won't.

Answer 10

>Should we enact laws to make it more difficult for people to receive a divorce?

No, that would force people to stay in unhealthy relationships. It would be better to make it harder for people to get married.

Step one, get rid of Las Vegas drive through McMarriages.