English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Please note that the Bible is essencailly a story book and there is no hard archeological evidence or physical evidence to proove this - also were did all the water go?

2007-04-05 01:16:55 · 27 answers · asked by prof. Jack 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

27 answers

In the old Pagan religions, "water was the source of life", without it their fields, live stock and themselves would die; so naturally water would be the source of creation stories of any religion. Religious christian people have been using parts of science (or cherry pick) research to prove that the great flood/ or any other story that fits into their bible beliefs. People who claimed they found Noah's ark, have not giving any real evidence, (the sources 2004-Sept, the evidence was fake) and they been searching for over 40+ years at the same place.
.Earth is the center of the solar system, wrong
.Earth is flat. wrong
.Adam and Eve. wrong
.Noah's ark. wrong
The bible is a fairytale and given time, history will repeat itself, and the judo-christian (middle eastern) religion will fade, & a new religion will emerge, I just hope that when the new religion comes about, it won't be close minded.

2007-04-05 03:00:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I have watched T.V. programs on the History Channel, the Learning Channel even A.B.C. news Special that have scientific evidence that a flood did happen. Did you know that many cultures around the world have written accounts of a great flood? Not just the Christian faith! There are water rings on the rocks and mountains. How did the water rings get there? How did Native American Indians know about the same flood that the people in the Holy Land knew. America was not well traveled . Many cultures have the same story about a man who collects the animals 2 by 2 and his family the mans name is different the area of the world is different. Please do some research in this matter I think you'll find this fascinating.

2007-04-05 01:35:18 · answer #2 · answered by Pamela V 7 · 1 0

No hard archaeological evidence...how do you think the Grand Canyon got there? And please don't give me this story about the trickle known as the Colorado River.

Another thing you might want to consider: many different cultures who had no contact with each other have stories about some sort of great flood where one man and his family and animals survived by various means (some cultures say in a boat, some on the back of a giant turtle, etc). These stories are found in cultures such as American Indian, African, and Pacific Islander. If this event never occurred, it seems pretty coincidental that all these unrelated cultures have virtually the same story.

If you really want proof of the flood, why don't you check out the organization Answers in Genesis. If you're just looking to start a fight, never mind.

2007-04-05 01:38:39 · answer #3 · answered by irishharpist 4 · 1 0

6000 years ago, God created Adam & Eve
4400 years ago, there was a Flood which destroyed everyone except for 8 people
The current population curve started 4400 years ago.
If you start with 8 people 4400 years ago, you could grow a population of 6 Billion people in 4400 years(today).

The oldest tree in the world
is 4,400 years old.
This is consistent with a Flood 4,400 years old, as the Bible says.

The Great Barrier Reef, Australia
is 4,200 years old.
This is consistent with a flood 4,400 years ago, as the Bible says.

Niagara Falls
Are eroding at the rate of 4.7 feet per year.
Has only moved 7.5 miles from when it started.
If the Earth is billions of years old – why has it not eroded right back to Lake Eyrie by now?
Answer: Because the Niagara Falls started at the Flood, 4,400 years ago, as the Bible says.

Saltiness of the oceans
When it rains, 70% of rainwater evaporates or soaks into the ground.
30% of rainwater runs into the oceans.
The rainwater takes with it mineral salts washed out of the ground.
The oceans get saltier all the time.
Today the oceans are less than 3.6% salt
This could have happened in the time since the Flood, 4,400 years ago.

2007-04-05 01:42:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I have answered this many times, In the beginning there was no oceans & at the end of the milliennium there will be no more oceans. Gen. 1:10 They were called SEAS, which is smaller then a Ocean, All the waters from the flood went into the lower valleys on earth causing there to be Oceans, & yes, The more sceince tries to disprove creation or even the flood, The more they are without words, Did your sciencetists forget to tell you that they have dug up palm leaves in the North & South Pole regions, I wonder why they did not tell you?

2007-04-05 01:32:12 · answer #5 · answered by birdsflies 7 · 1 2

Faith. Something you cannot see, you don't have any proof. It is something that people lean on because we are so small, I believe in God with all my heart. And yes, I do believe the flood occurred. You can't pick away at the bible. It is either all true or not. It is not a fairy tale, nor a fable, or an entertaining book to read. It is only inspirational to those who believe in God, trust that he loves you, and died for you. The reason you find it fake, and "unrealistic", is that you don't have Jesus as your savior. So to answer your question, yes, I do believe in something that no one can prove and no one can see. But having faith is one of the strongest measures of character. It is being able to rely on something (someone) that isn't right in front of you. It shows others that you are not afraid to stand up for what you believe and you know that you have a rock to lean on and even when your life sucks and you think there is nothing that can help you, God's there holding your hand. Read this...

One night a man had a dream. He dreamed he was
walking along the beach with the Lord. Across the
sky flashed scenes from his life. For each scene, he
noticed two sets of footprints in the sand: one
belonging to him, and the other to the Lord. When
the last scene of his life flashed before him, he
looked back at the footprints in the sand. He
noticed that many times along the path of his life
there was only one set of footprints. He also noticed
that it happened at the very lowest and saddest
times in his life. This really bothered him and he
questioned the Lord about it. "Lord, You said that
once I decided to follow you, You'd walk with me all
the way. But I have noticed that during the most
troublesome times in my life, there is only one set
of footprints. I don't understand why when I needed
you most you would leave me." The Lord replied,
"My son, My precious child, I love you and I would
never leave you. During your times of trial and
suffering, when you see only one set of footprints, it
was then that I Carried You."

Happy Easter

2007-04-05 01:25:59 · answer #6 · answered by Bree 2 · 0 1

I am Christian (Roman Catholic). We are not taught that evolution and creation are two opposing ideas. Science and religion in the 21st century are two different ideas and it is very good that we have both. Before i get into a totally different topic, i will tell you that as concerns the flood, i worked contraction in Colorado in the Rocky Mountains and it is not unusual to find fossilized sea life in the Rockies. That may not be conclusive proof of the Great Flood, but the Rockies were definitely underwater in some prehistoric time.

2007-04-05 01:25:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I believe it the evidence is the book it self the pictures of jesus is another some one saw what he look like, another is holy grail, the towel that he wiped hes face on before he died that another way they knew what he looked like some how when he wiped hes face on the towel it reflected hes image. There a bunch of evidence according to modern science today. And the flood is also known as an ice age once the flood froze.

2007-04-05 01:27:18 · answer #8 · answered by FunDude#1 2 · 0 1

The "Dogmatic Constitution on Divine Revelation" (Vat. 11, Ch. 3.11) of the Catholic Church says that "all that the inspired, or sacred writers, affirm should be regarded as affirmed by the Holy Spirit, we must acknowledge that the books of Scripture firmly, and without error, teach that truth which God, for the sake of our salvation, wished to be confided to the sacred Scriptures." This is the Church's teaching on the matter after twenty centuries of Christian discernment.

Biblical inerrancy, then, is the Bible's privilege of never teaching error. Does this mean that every statement in the Bible is divine teaching? Of course not. The Bible does not always teach. There are many statements in its various books that are there for historical, geographical, poetic or other reasons. However, whenever a biblical author intends to teach us something, then the Holy Spirit intends that too. Everything that the Bible teaches is without error, but everything in the Bible is not meant as teaching. Each author was left free by the Lord to express himself according to the ideas of his own day. It is the revelation contained in the Scriptures that is important.

There are many accounts in the Bible, which employ a literary device used by Jewish Old and New Testament writers called Midrash. Midrash is the substantive of the Hebrew word darash which means to search, to investigate, to study and, also, to expound on the fruits of the research. The aim of Midrash is to draw from Scripture a lesson for the present.

Midrash could also be defined as a "reflection on Scripture in the light of the actual situation of God's people and of the developments of God's action on its history. It proposes to explain the meaning of Scripture in the light of the later historical experience of God's people. This kind of interpretation often opened the door to embellishments of the sacred accounts, anachronisms, and a freedom in handling and maneuvering the data of tradition that were at times a little too candid and certainly very imaginative."

A good example is the Midrashic story of Noah and the flood. It is the divine message, which is important, (God saves his children from evil) not the literal account of the story.

Peace and every blessing!

2007-04-05 01:23:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

No, the Bible is not a story book, and every piece of "hard archeological" evidence that is uncovered shows it to be true.

2007-04-05 01:21:00 · answer #10 · answered by arewethereyet 7 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers