Atheists, I need to know something?

Question

Since humans descended from monkeys, why don't you just accept them as Gods and worship them?
If they are Gods, then you win. If not, then you haven't lost anything.

Do you have morals? If you do, then thank the monkey God for them.

What are you even doing in this section anyway?

VQ
it's way more than 2 drinks

Justizil

yes, I do

Answer 1

This is great. This is supposed to sound stupid, and of course if does. But the very stupidity that you attempt to impose on atheists is the actual behavior of religious people. You are projecting the odd behavior of religious people on people for whom it is not appropriate, obviously knowing in the back of your mind that it is relevant but just not knowing to whom.

Answer 2

I'm not an atheist, however the lack of reason in your bizarre questions makes it almost impossible not comment. How do you expect an atheist to answer your questions when they make no sense whatsoever? They are completely incoherent and totally devoid of logic. Sorry, but I hope you don't expect serious answers to nonsensical questions such as these.

Your questions seem to imply that you incorrectly assume that all atheists (and only atheists) accept the scientific evidence supporting the idea of evolution. Second, you seem to draw the strange conclusion that because these people understand and accept a scientific idea, their object of worship should therefore be a monkey?! Huh? Weird...

Furthermore, what does their acceptance of scientific evidence have to do with their morals, or lack thereof? I know plenty of atheists with good morals, and plenty without. Just like I know plenty of Christians with good morals, and plenty without. Lastly, I could, of course, point out that some morals are more subjective than others...but I won't get into that. This should be enough to help you for now.

Answer 3

I find it nice to have morals not based upon a standard made by someone else or being scared into being moral person. It means more to be a moral person just because. As far as monkey gods go, that is just plain stupid. That rite was amended to the Atheist Social Order's constitution years ago. It only makes sense to worship the great Mantiki, the monkey god. Praise Mantiki.

Answer 4

First and foremost, you are thinking of Darwinists, and not Atheists. If you are going to use twisted 3rd grade logic to insult somebody, please raise your hand and ask your teacher for one of the grown-up books, an Encyclopedia Brittanica perhaps, so you can get your facts correct.
It is very important to have facts correct when presenting an argument as weak as this one.

My question is why do you seemingly represent Christianity, and yet break the Ten Commandments by doing so.
In case you hadn't realized you capitalized all the G's in reference to the monkey god and gods. This is Blasphemy in the written form. One of the first thing I learned at Bible School, was how to distinguish and talk about God and the many false gods of others. And only One God should ever have his title capitalized.

Furthermore, you encourage (tempt) Atheists most of who are not currently breaking any commandments to act against the Ten Commandments by worshiping monkeys.

The Atheist do break the Ten Commandments you say?
I say which one?

The only possible one you could suspect is the first "you shall have no other gods before Me." But by their very nature Atheists have no god and therefore cannot have any before the One True God.

Why do we try to use hate and trickery to lead the lost souls further away from the Light?

Perhaps what you should ask the Atheists is how they manage to live in a world filled with the hatred and intolerance of Christians like yourself.

Answer 5

The monkey god tells me that you are a moron and I should hit you w/ a coconut on your head.
News flash for ya hun, I was not in this section. When I pushed "Anwer" Your question came up and the monkey said I should answer it.

I will buy everyone a round!


Creationism Vs. Evolution


Evolutionists believe that creationism is not a science because it is not backed by good research. The article by Frank R. Zindler states that we are presented with more than one example of mythological tales about creation yet we are asked to believe in only one god/creator. Who should this god be? The answer points to the god of western civilization.
Creation Theory misuses the term “theory” because in science a true theory must pass tests using scientific principles and laws. Because a concept of a god is not testable creationism cannot be seen as a theory.
On the flipside, evolution is testable. Fossil records and geographical distribution of plants and animals do not fit into the “theory” of creationism because of the many things that predate man. In John W. Klotz’s article “Creationist View Points;” Klotz admits that this does cause a problem for creationism. He counts it by saying that there are also things evolutionists cannot explain either. He feels that there are flaws in evolution evidenced by mutations. He feels that mutations are usually harmful in species and often lead to their demise. Evolutionists combat that by saying that it is usually only the fast mutations that are usually harmful. That evolution is meant to be a slow process and survival of the fittest.
Klotz feels that scientists cannot see creationism because they lack “the faithful eye.” Faith is believing in the unseen. Creationists believe that behind the process of changes in the world is the hand of God. In Klotz’s article he clings to the work of Isaac Newton and LaPlace who believed that God created the universe and knew the impending processes and put them into place. Klotz worries scientists will further reason that God’s existence would then no longer be needed. Thus furthering evolutionist’s stance. “If there is no purpose in the universe then there is no reason for a god.”
Klotz feels that creationism points out the complexities of nature as an evidence of the wisdom of God and his plan. God has a purpose in everything that happens even though creationists have no way of demonstrating proof.
I feel the overall theory of evolution makes more sense. To me Zindler’s article was more convincing because evolution does not base itself on a personal belief system fueled by emotion. Religion has too many areas that are not answerable. I feel religion is an ancient human attempt to define themselves and to provide basic principles of self-governing.

Works Cited

http://www.atheists.org/evolution/creationscience.html
http://www.creationism.org/symposium/symplnoz.htm

Answer 6

You just showed that you don't have enough education to argue this. Science does not say we came from monkeys, it says that we came from a common ancestor. Come back when you can actually argue it from an educated point of you and we'll talk.

As for morals, you don't need religion to have morals because it isn't religion that determines morals.

And as for what we're doing in this section, I'm not even going to deign that question with an answer since you just convinced me you're trolling.

Answer 7

I know you was asking atheists this question, but I want to say, Not any of us come from a monkey, An atheist may not believe in God, but he was created just like the rest of us, I didn't come from a monkey, You didn't come from a monkey, and neither did the atheists. -- Do you want me to repeat that?
Just because we act like monkeys, don't mean we came from monkeys. Now everybody lessen, WE DID NOT COME FROM MONKEY's

Answer 8

Let's start from the bottom and work our way up, shall we? For why we are here, go read a few of the similar questions on this topic and quit bothering us about it.
Two, yes, of course we have morals. Why would I thank a monkey god for them when 1. I don't believe in gods and 2. I came up with most of them on my own?
Three, humans didn't decend from monkeys. They decended from pond scum. Get it right.
I think this one calls for two drinks for two stupid questions in one.

Answer 9

Humans did not descend from monkeys, we descended from a common ancestor, as did our now extinct cousins, such as homo erectus and homo habilis. We're pretty sure the first one was Australopithecus.

PS: I'd rather worship a monkey than an invisible being.

Answer 10

Do you Christians even read our posts?????????

Not one atheist believes that humans descended from monkeys! Get over it!

Learn some science!
,