English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Does that possibly make you automatically ignore it because you know it will be blasphemous or something?

2007-04-04 16:25:45 · 24 answers · asked by Midge 7 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

24 answers

Well..when their nick is Slimey the God hater or something..I usually can see where the question is going!

2007-04-04 16:29:52 · answer #1 · answered by Eartha Q 6 · 1 0

Never. I am a smart@$$ by nature and I know I am taken the wrong way sometimes. I am also a non-christian, so a lot of what I believe in my faith is considered blasphemous to some christians. I take each question as it is written and just have fun with the ones that are obviously sheer silliness.

~Morg~

2007-04-04 16:30:30 · answer #2 · answered by morgorond 5 · 2 0

I always answer a question I see that I think is worth answering and that I may have good information on.

I rarely look at the persons other questions to determine whether or not I'll answer. However if the question is way out there I'll look to see if all questions are that way and if I think it's not legit I won't waste my time.

2007-04-04 16:29:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I usually pass on those questions, because i realize that even if they do sound serious, they are usually just making fun.

but once in a while, I will go ahead and answer, if they are spoofing, then i have still put my beliefs down for others to read.

I used to spoof them back but I try not to do that anymore.

unless I am just in a mood, but i know that it makes other Christians look bad also, and I apologize for that.

2007-04-04 16:35:09 · answer #4 · answered by Hannah's Grandpa 7 · 1 0

Being an ex submariner it takes A LOT to offend me. I'm hear to laugh too, as I can rarely learn anything - I'm too deeeeep in my rut, to change.
I do think the icons were a bit much a few months back - but they're gone, so no I don't have many worries anymore here.

2007-04-04 17:23:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i dont track down their previous posts.. i dont pay much attention to the avatar or the name with it. okay, yes i look at the avatar. when they're different than the yahoo avatars.. and i look at the faces that each person chooses and i assume that its close to what they really look like.. or perhaps wish they looked like.
but aside from that i dont formulate how i'm going to answer based on any of that.
i ignore the attitude. and go light on reporting abuse.

i appreciate the serious searching inquisitive questions. and overall concentrate on giving answers to the best of my knowledge.
whether its taken in or not. i leave that with God.

when i see that its humorous.. there are times when i join in.
...

2007-04-04 16:30:55 · answer #6 · answered by opalist 6 · 0 0

If a person's name is continually associated with argumentative or hateful questions, I don't even bother. Why cast pearls before swine. I would love to help anyone who really wants to know but I am not here to argue.

2007-04-04 17:13:50 · answer #7 · answered by Sparkle1 6 · 0 0

There is always agreement--somewhere. Hegel believed Kant. Marx believed Hegel. Lenin believed Marx. Augustine believed Plato. That led to the Dark Ages. Ayn Rand believed Aristotle. That led to her being cast, before "political correctness" had a name, as being "hateful." But Thomas Aquinas believed Aristotle, and that led to the Enlightenment. The Cato Institute, The Ayn Rand Institute, The Center for Objectivist Studies, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie know "enlightenment" when they see it--wish those two luck getting "Atlas Shrugged" made. Can you see Pitt as John Galt? Jolie will be awsome as Dagney Taggart. Most readers revere the "benign existentialism" of Albert Camus. Who can deny "The Plague" is a great novel? "The Rebel" is a thoughtful work on philosophical rebellion. Kant is the most influential philosopher; also the most confusing and the most irrational. He is responsible for more confusion in philosophy than Socrates who comes in second. But many take him "at his word," "on faith," and have no idea what they are agreeing to because one cannot understand the irrational--take simply take it on "faith." But Rand comes in second in being influential--influential to people who take nothing on faith and everything on reason. She has millions of devoted fans around the world, and even more critics who are too "politically correct" to accept that she gave Aristotle back to the twentieth century the way Aquinas gave him back to the middle ages.

2016-05-17 08:40:01 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Actually, I don't look at the avators when answering questions. It matter not to me who is asking, just if they are being too disrespectful. May God Bless U.

2007-04-04 16:34:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I dont really pay much attention, but I try to just answer questions as they come. But I wont answer a question when it is absolutely stupid or just a joke.

2007-04-04 16:30:05 · answer #10 · answered by Scully 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers