2007-04-04 11:52:46 · 9 answers · asked by Aspurtaime Dog Sneeze 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
That's it, I have to let my secret out. I LOOOOOVE you, dog sneeze!!!!
Signed,
I WALK FUNNY
2007-04-04 11:58:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Everyone agrees microevolution is real, but is just the variety already preprogrammed within the DNA that is being isolated. How do evolutionists claim that macroevolution (formation of new species) is true? Evolutionists just blur the line between microevolution and macroevolution. They assume that any change can be extrapolated to a species change. Evolutionists also postulate DNA mutations, copying errors, are the raw material upon which natural selection can operate to ultimately form new species. Fruit fly experiments combined breeding with irradiation to cause mutations in a species that has a very short generation period to speed up the effects of evolution. Although some strange four winged flies were generated, no improvements that would give a breeding advantage were produced or any new species. Does Punctuated Equilibrium save the theory of evolution and eliminate special creation as the source of our origin? Is Punctuated Equilibrium a testable scientific theory? Theories are testable when they make predictions which scientists can in principle observe. Many scientists have stated that scientific theories must be based upon repeatable observations subject to testing, and be "falsifiable," so observations can refute the theory. Punctuated Equilibrium claims that natural selection operated with great effect exactly where it was least likely to be documented; in small, localized, transitory populations. The lack of evidence that made Punctuated Equilibrium a concept also makes it untestable. In addition, if evolution cannot happen under slow, gradual Darwinian evolution, how could it happen under Punctuated Equilibrium in a much shorter time? No potential or additional mechanism is provided. However, the actual fossils that do exist without the presence of transitional fossils actually support special creation as a testable scientific theory. However, because of the change in the definition of science during the last century this statement probably should be qualified as only being true under the old definition of science. That definition included a search for truth rather than trying to find a natural explanation for everything and eliminating any supernatural conclusion as false by definition. looks like evolution can NOT be proved,no matter how hard anyone tries. God is the supreme creator of all.
2016-05-17 07:21:16 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would wager that you couldn't put 700,000 Pascals of air into a 2 liter bottle of coke without losing your hearing temporarily. (learned this by accident)
2007-04-04 11:59:44 · answer #3 · answered by poseidenneptune 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only person who uses big words in this section is dog sneeze. Well... at least the only person at the moment.
*drink*
That's how I knew it was you before I clicked on the question.
2007-04-04 11:57:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
*drink* What did I ever do to you that you would continue to try to destroy my liver in this way?
2007-04-04 11:56:10 · answer #5 · answered by Kallan 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
*sipping* Hot toddy time...
2007-04-04 11:57:57 · answer #6 · answered by Ũniνέгsäl Рдnтsthέisт™ 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
which ever one he could pronounce,
2007-04-04 12:00:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I guess we have to drink now. Thanks...glug glug. and thanks for the 2 pts.
2007-04-04 11:57:20 · answer #8 · answered by Greenwood 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
*drink*
Oook?
2007-04-04 12:01:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋