English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

it is my understanding that he is the "son of man." draw the lines for me.

2007-04-04 09:35:21 · 3 answers · asked by bluebear 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

you can't answer with conjecture, all of this stuff, the miracles, is conjecture and not in fact, fact. you cannot argue that bible is true using only the bible. "begs the question"

2007-04-04 10:01:34 · update #1

3 answers

Turned water into wine, walked on water, fed thousands with barley any food, gave sight to the blind, raised the dead, ascended the grave. The empty tomb is evidence. As were all the old testament scripture that described his coming and his death is great detail, hundreds of years before he was born.

2007-04-04 09:39:57 · answer #1 · answered by corEy marsh 3 · 0 0

He answered the pharisees in the affirmative when they asked if he was the son of God, and also used the term son of man in the same response. The pharisees accused him of blasphemy for this, so it doesn't appear that either he or they differentiated between the two.

Mat 26:63 But Jesus held his peace. And the high priest answered and said unto him, I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us whether thou be the Christ, the Son of God. 64 Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven. 65 Then the high priest rent his clothes, saying, He hath spoken blasphemy; what further need have we of witnesses? behold, now ye have heard his blasphemy.

2007-04-04 16:40:33 · answer #2 · answered by Rossonero NorCal SFECU 7 · 0 0

He often talked about His Father and if you saw him then you saw the Father.

2007-04-04 16:48:35 · answer #3 · answered by kaehya2003 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers