No, they would donate their wages to Halliburton and bechtel, just like they donate 75% of all the money "for the troops" from these supplemental spending bills.
2007-04-04 07:26:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by gunkinthedrain 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
Looking at the present mental make upof President Bush's Govt.& their faith in their alies added with .selfish motives,"Might is right Policy", who are acting like devils without caring opinion of world citizons, would definately run over the Iran . And would be shading crocodile tears before the world.And would smilingly express sorrow and say" We needed money to pay the compansation to the 15 captured troops."
2007-04-04 14:57:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Vinor_pan1942 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well the Iranians tried this on some US personnel and this is what it got them.
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1605487,00.html
This also took place within Iraqi territory..go figure.
2007-04-04 14:37:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by h h 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
They get paid regardless. No stop in wages.
2007-04-04 14:27:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Rusty Shackleford 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
If they'd been Americans: they wouldn't have been taken prisoner; there'd have been dead Iranians floating in the Gulf.
2007-04-04 14:44:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Yak Rider 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
haha, no there would have been a vicious gun battle right there in the water. bad scene. no taking the soldiers hostage. just men with guns getting it on. we dealt with their candy-*** hostage taking bullshit in 1980 so we know how the iranian fundamentalists roll.
2007-04-04 14:33:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Super G 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
no. they would have blundered in with force and got many people killed including the troops they were trying to rescue.
2007-04-04 14:26:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Alan S 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
As Alan S says..............
2007-04-04 14:28:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Merovingian 6
·
0⤊
3⤋