What are your views on Nuclear power?

Question

Should nuclear power plants continue being used and used in the future as an energy source we are dependant on?

Answer 1

We're going to run out of fossil fuels and nuclear power is the best alternative at present. However, with global warming and rising sea levels, couldn't that cause instability in the earths crust and problems in costal regions. Builders of Nuclear power stations might find it difficult to find safe areas to build them in, areas that won't be subject to flooding, earth tremors and extreme weather conditions.

Answer 2

The current fission-based reactors don't have a long lifetime, because there is a limited supply of fissionable material.

Fusion is the way to go, because you get about 1000x the energy, the products are not radioactive, and you can fuse almost anything lighter than iron. The problems arise from the speeds needed for the atoms colliding to actually fuse, and materials that can contain the heat. If those problems are overcome, nuclear power is much more efficient than any other form of power.

Answer 3

Nuclear skill does concerns me, yet i think of which you need to on the 2d that we build and take care of 'some' new stations, through fact there is not any determination suited now, and fossil fuels are working out or too costly. whilst a workable sparkling and secure determination comes alongside, then we would desire to continuously scrap our nuclear skill as quickly as a hazard. till then, renewable energies are no longer a competent determination the two and are ruining our environment in different procedures. Carpeting Britain's panorama with windmills is undesirable, and that is killing organic international and spoiling organic splendor besides as inflicting a nuisance to human beings residing in the location of the monstrosities. those whales that have been beached purely some days in the past 'would' have beached through fact a lot of them have been injured through a hazard touch with undersea turbine blades. Nuclear skill is the only possible answer suited now, whether it needs to be enormously regulated and utmost high quality and secure practices adhered to.

Answer 4

We need it, both to help reduce global warming and reduce dependence on oil, which is getting more expensive.

We need to develop the technology to make it safe from terrorists and manage disposal of the waste. We can do that.

Kyoto does not ban it.

We also need to work on and use solar and wind. But, right now, nuclear is the only way that can produce the very large anounts of energy we need.

Answer 5

Yep, it may not be the most pleasant alternative but realistically we do need other options for energy with fossil fuel supplies running out and other 'green' methods of energy production, such as biomass and wind power only ever accounting for a small proportion of energy production.

At the moment, it really is one of the only real ways of stopping an energy crisis in the future.

Answer 6

Nuclear power is safe and efficient. It seems our best option to reduce our use of fossil fuels. If something better comes along, we should use that but right now Nuclear power is the most efficient and cleanest means of generating electricity.

Answer 7

Earth is rapidly running out of natural fuel sources, so nuclear power is one - if not `the` main source - of the main sources of power. So like it or not it will be with us for a long, long, long, long, long time yet.

Answer 8

Too slow to build and get on line. Too expensive. Too much of a target for terrorists. Too much trouble to find a safe site to dispose of waste. And always the possibility of a melt down.

I wouldn't mind going back to a few more coal-fired power plants, a little bit dirtier air and tell the Arabs they can keep that oil.

Answer 9

I believe it is a good source, but unfortunately under the Kyoto accord it is banned.

Answer 10

your just looking for a reaction.