No but it sounds like baby talk!
2007-04-03 22:53:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
(Matthew 12:32) For example, whoever speaks a word against the Son of man, it will be forgiven him; but whoever speaks against the holy spirit, it will not be forgiven him, no, not in this system of things nor in that to come.
Take the case of Judas Escariot. He betrayed Jesus, and his sin was NOT forgiven. even though the act was against Jesus, the sin was also against God's arrangement, or god's power, the Holy Spirit.
Judas will NOT be resurrected. Revelation 20; 12,13
2007-04-04 03:53:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by pugjw9896 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Define "sin". Do you mean an act against morality? It's not - it's just a superstitious fear. And one of my favorite fears! Things like people who believe they are offending god by saying things like “god damn it” or “I swear to god”. Or the need to capitalize god in a sentence (God not god). Imagine for a moment if it were actually true that if you swore to god he’d punish you. What kind of sensitive god would that be? Creating the whole universe and his ego is so shallow that if you use his name in vain he gets offended. Just what type of overwhelming proof would people need to abandon such a belief? Clearly I can say “god damn” several times a day and nothing seems to happen at that moment so it’s clearly some delayed punishment down the road type of thing. How many times do you need to say “god damn it” before god gets really mad and zaps your *** with a lightening bolt? So far I said “god damn it” six times today and nothing happened.
Apparently, people are really still beating drums to their gods around a big great fire with wooden sticks in their noises and they don’t recognize it. If we look at some other so called “primitive” belief systems and watched some tribe dancing for rain you’d say ‘that’s crazy - look at those idiots” But yet people still believe that making the sign of the cross is going to bring them some blessing. Amazing. It goes back to two things. The first is the almost universal simplistic view that people have about our existence and out potential creator. The pronoun “he “ is indicative of this type of belief system. “He” is like us. “He” gets mad. “He” gets insulted. Are you serious? Some human type “he” created all this? And “he’s” just as sensitive as the rest of us? That would make me sad - not afraid to piss “him” off. If that’s the case - god damn it we’re all screwed. I’d hate to think that the all mighty creator get’s mad when you don’t wear some hat all the time. Or fail to kneel before an alter. Is it just me or does anyone else see the parallel to other rituals in the past which we now find retarded (yes I say retarded) . Second, it’s that these ritualistic beliefs are like colds. Once you pick one up from some alleged reliable source that’s usually all you need. After that it’s almost impossible to get rid of it. “My dad said so” or “that’s part of my religion” is the standard type of explanations you get when you ask someone why doing something ritualistically is going to make a difference.
Do people remember when we used to sacrifice animals? What happened to that practice? Allegedly it was supposed to appease the gods. No more I guess. Instead we replaced that ritual with things like wearing certain attire, kneeling, chanting, bowing, making the sign of a cross, etc. I have to assume that one day someone woke up and said “you know that whole kill the animal on the alter thing is not working for god anymore. It’s so messy - get me a yamika instead”. And for those Christians and Jews I would remind you all that sacrificing animals is biblically sanctioned. So how come it’s being ignored? Did god send out a memo entitled “animal sacrifices to be replaced with kneeling?” I must have missed the memo. So basically these rituals are taught (or caught) and then once we have a belief that they are actually doing something affirmative for our relationship with god, unfortunately (as I have noted before) our genetic biological programming makes us instinctively want to defend this idea despite the fact that it’s just an extension of things we clearly no longer believe. While we know killing animals does not work to actually influence either god or our situation, we find some other thing to do which we think does. However, the replacement ritual is just really a modified version of the original. And bizarre as it is, we just don’t recognize the substitution. What’s more, we’re often afraid (fearful) that we actually might offend god if we don’t keep doing this ritual. Which is also a byproduct of our programming and social interactions (with for example authority, i.e. our parents). Not only that, but we’re not even willing to acknowledge that such a practice might be wrong even in the face of probative evidence that it’s practice is not having any effect. If all you needed to do was pray or eat kosher or follow 10 or even 10,000 rules to stay clear of trouble than all those “religiously” following those things would be invincible. And as we know they are not.
2007-04-04 03:01:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Yes it is!!!
How you gonna get outta hell now?
Don't make fun of Jesus. He will strike you down!!!
And now you just sinned twice, by typing it twice.
Your hopeless!!!
2007-04-04 03:08:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by hecatemother 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
nah
2007-04-04 02:52:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by paTROLLer 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
yes.<><
2007-04-04 02:55:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by funnana 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
bajeebus isn't a word...say it all you want...
2007-04-04 02:51:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋