Actually it would be Joshua the Anointed, since "Christ" or "Messiah" means "Anointed One."
I guess it's for the same reason we call angels "angels" instead of "messengers" (the direct translation of angelos).
2007-04-03 14:50:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Neil 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because (1) English borrows heavily from Greek, but not much from Hebrew; and (2) for centuries western Christianity used the Septuagint, which was the first Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible.
2007-04-03 14:13:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous Lutheran 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is the English translation from the Greek for IESUS CHRISTOS.
The New Testament was originally written in the Greek.
Personally, I think the rendering Messiah is more appropriate than Christ in many passages of the New Testament; for example, Acts 17:3
2007-04-03 14:09:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by wefmeister 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good question, but Iesous has to deal with specific gematria associations. Gematria is a numerical system of symbolism that belongs to the Greek and Hebrew alphabets. Therefore when translating the Hebrew Joshua into the Greek language, philosophers of the times used Gematria to determine a mystical name.
In ancient cultures, to know the name of a being was to be able to use it and employ its power.
The correct name is Messiah Yoheshu'ah.
2007-04-03 14:23:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mike G 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Greek is what the New Testament was written in, at least, that's the language it was converted to. Joshua isn't English, either.. But if I go to Germany, my name isn't gonna change. It's just different people of different cultures call God different names.
2007-04-03 14:07:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you have a problem with them using the Greek name, why would the Hebrew name make a difference? Besides, J*sus spoke Aramaic, not Hebrew. Why don't you use the Aramaic name?
2007-04-03 14:18:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by LadySuri 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, the Greek is Iesous Christos (Pronounced ee-ay-sooce' khris-tos')
In the English, we have kept a transliteration of Christ (which means "Anointed One," as opposed to Savior).
Savior in the Greek is "soter."
2007-04-03 14:07:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I didn't know there was an English name. For why we use the Greek name, I guess you'd have to go back to the first Bible translation to English was from Latin - so they probably just stuck with that Greco-Roman name written in Latin.
2007-04-03 14:08:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by daisyk 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
indexed here are diverse the issues Jesus stated approximately Himself: Jesus stated "i'm reality." replaced into Jesus telling the actuality whilst He stated that? Or replaced into He a liar? apart from, He stated that the only way you could comprehend God is thru Him. Jesus stated there is none good yet God, then He advised somebody that he's the coolest Shepherd, claiming to be good! Jesus stated that He did purely what He observed His Father in heaven do. (No guy has considered God at any time, yet Jesus SEES God and copies His behaviors, so Jesus would desire to be something greater suitable than an insignificant guy, on the grounds that no guy has considered God.) He KNEW God. He even stated that He got here from the very coronary heart of God, so He would desire to declare objectively, "once you have considered ME, you have considered the daddy." Jesus additionally stated "i'm life", and lower back, "i'm the bread of life that has come down from My Father in heaven to furnish life.", and lower back, "i'm the water of life. Whoever is thirsty, come to me, and out of his inner-maximum being shall bypass rivers of residing waters", and ultimately, "i'm the Resurrection and the life. If any guy have self assurance in me, nevertheless he would die, yet shall he stay lower back." He stated, "once you have considered me, you have considered the daddy." He stated, "You already have self assurance in God, now have self assurance in me." In his renowned e book “Mere Christianity”, C. S. Lewis makes here remark: "a guy who replaced into in user-friendly terms a guy and stated the form of issues Jesus stated would not be a large ethical instructor. He might the two be a lunatic - on the point with a guy who says he's a poached egg - or he could be the devil of hell. you will desire to take your determination. the two this replaced into, and is, the Son of God, in any different case a mad guy or something worse. you could close Him up for a fool or you could fall at His ft and make contact with Him Lord and God. yet enable us to no longer comprise any patronizing nonsense approximately His being a large human instructor. He has no longer left that open to us."
2016-10-02 03:28:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by guyden 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I prefer "Jebus H. Christos", myself.
2007-04-03 14:05:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋