Right. And it's ONLY atheists that do this. So let's gang up on them and force some Christian Love on them. That'll learn them for trying to think for themselves.
2007-04-03 13:06:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
okay i am going to listen and pause/edit as i imagine of stuff. i am going to allow you to comprehend at the same time as i'm finished in the finest edit. Edit: properly the first bit about the watch ignores the actual incontrovertible fact that if situations existed that consistently made issues more advantageous watch like, you would ultimately finally end up with an eye fixed. merely because it would not artwork for inanimate gadgets does no longer mean it would not make experience for residing issues. Edit: Atheism and/or evolution would not unavoidably make one imagine they haven't any purpose, or perhaps if it does it provides no more advantageous or a lot less credibility to I.D. To be completely truthful, claims like this are merely ad Homin (If I were provided that factor period proper.). extremely surely, I nevertheless sense I genuinely have a purpose, yet i don't believe of that calls for some thing supernatural. Edit: there is not any longer any nice tuning, a minimum of no longer to me. the creation or no longer of such tuning is subjective and in no way evidence. extra the example of protons being heavier then neutrons in a diverse universe is incorrect. Its the composition, no longer weight that adjustments the charge. Edit: also, merely because existence as all of us comprehend it may not exist with diverse guidelines did not recommend a diverse kind of existence couldn't have take position. Edit: well-known guidelines do not extremely recommend a deity, or at perfect exhibits a deistic theory of god. If such guidelines required a deity, then the deity ought to likewise prefer to be more advantageous orderly and ought to for this reason also require a author. Edit: i'd be extremely truthful and say maximum of it is coming for the time of as opinion/subjective evidence that exhibits at perfect a deistic god if conventional. back, merely my truthful opinion. Edit: The DVD argument is comparable to the watch one, as I defined my concepts on above. Edit: thinking precis theory has been shown interior decrease mammals that we probable are heavily on the challenge of and provides evolutionary advantages, its life isn't a marvel nor a authentic argument for layout. Edit: okay, it extremely is the top of the video. i do not assume you to accept as true with all of it yet optimistically you'll a minimum of learn somewhat about yet another standpoint from it. Cheers.
2016-12-03 05:51:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, if the theory is subject to testing then why not put it to the test. If it doesn't survive the bashing it isn't a very good theory. Good theories are supported by the data, bad theories are not. And it is a sign of intelligence to discard bad theories and test new ones until you get it right.
2007-04-04 06:51:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by OPM 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
OK, are people now spelling words wrong on purpose? I don't come up with my own theories - I leave that to scientists.
2007-04-03 13:07:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by ReeRee 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Any theories we subscribe to are based on evidence. The same isn't true for the religious.
2007-04-03 13:07:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess you need to learn what the word theory means.
Theists have myths.
Science has theories.
Got it?
2007-04-03 13:13:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
uhm..
im an open minded atheist..
ive never bashed someone's thoughts..
2007-04-03 13:09:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by uhohspaghettiohohs 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cause their mind closes every time they try to keep an open mind!
2007-04-03 13:05:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Exercising your reason is not dumb.
2007-04-03 13:05:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I guess....they're minds are not so open
as they claim
2007-04-03 13:13:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Eartha Q 6
·
0⤊
0⤋