If the Muslims want Sharia law in the states, what will libs do?

Question

This is not a joke. They are pushing for it in England.
Don't say it can't happen - majority rules. Or it could be done by force.

Answer 1

The libs will sh!t bricks, and whine again about being "tolerant," as if Islamicists (as opposed to Muslims) were rational people.

Me? As a conservative, heterosexual male, I'll just go with the flow. I'll marry another three wives, kill any infidel who tries to date my daughters, and praise Allah that I can now carry my AK-47 around on the street.

Answer 2

That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen. Liberals would be against this just like they're against any law that has a religious bias. Religion does not belong in the law! Don't speak to something you know nothing about.

You people who rant all day about liberals wanting to "take down the U.S." need to take the tinfoil off your heads. Just because someone disagrees with you, doesn't make them a crazy extremist. I can't believe how over the top some of you get with your statements. Liberals love the U.S. just as much, and it pisses them off when they see someone trampling all over it.

I love that the same people who are for Christian based laws are the same people who say that liberals would be the ones who would support Muslim laws. Your just don't get it. Christianity, Muslim, Jew - do whatever you want, it still doesn't belong in our laws!

Answer 3

You have my sympathies. They are pulling the same thing here in the USA like Minnesota, Iowa, Florida and Illinois and other places. Iguess their game plan is to keep everybody busy with Al-Queda and the like and our politicians on both sides of the pond fan themselves as fat cats and wave a white flag for the rest of us. Read: En Route To Global Occupation by Gary Kah, ISBN:0-010311-97-8

Answer 4

They will bend over backwards to allow these things to be accepted, we are kind of in a catch 22 in this country. We are founded on separation of Church and state, and we shouldn't show favorites to anyone, technically. But, when one's religion directly calls for the conversion or eradication of infidels, then you must give pause.

Freedom isn't free. Don't worry though, there are enough pragmatists in the USA that will start claiming back the streets so to speak.

Answer 5

Who is pushing for it in England? Sources please? The government of the United States does not allow any religious body to be the law in government, as it would infringe upon the right of freedom of religion. I think that Liberals would be against that.

Also, majority rules does not apply to anything that would infringe upon the rights of another. You can not vote on whether blue-eyed people should be slaves to brown-eyed people for example.

Answer 6

Its already going on in the states. I saw it on Glenn Beck. I think it was in Michigan. Muslim taxi drivers refuse to take fares that are drinking or even carrying unopened containers of alcohol. That goes against our own laws but they are getting by with it based on religion. Whats next will they refuse transportation to women without veils. We should be outraged.
I just don't see what libs have to do with it. This has been going on all this time right under our noses with republican leadership at the helm.

Answer 7

This liberal would object to Sharia-based laws just as strongly as I object to laws based solely on any other religious belief, including Christianity.

Answer 8

***IF***???

The "Islamification" process is well-organized
http://english.nctb.nl/publications/reports/aivd/

"Aslim taslam" (Arabic: أسلم تسلم) is a phrase meaning "accept Islam and you will be saved".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aslim_taslam
"Lan astaslem'' (Arabic: لن استسلم ) meaning "I will not surrender/submit". http://michellemalkin.com/archives/005934.htm
http://michellemalkin.com/archives/005894.htm
http://www.cafepress.com/hotairshop/1342354

In the US, both liberals and conservatives ***MUST ACCEDE*** to Muslim legal demands because of the written provision of the "free exercise of religion" clause of the first ammendment of the US constitution.

1689, Act of Toleration - England
1791, 1st amendment to US Constitution

http://finfree4all.blogspot.com/2006/01/sharia-compliant-bank-opens-in.html
Sharia compliant bank in Michigan ...only provide services to Muslims

http://www.university-bank.com/IslamicBanking/deposit.html
Sharia compliant bank University Bank and SHAPE™ Financial

http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/31608
Swimming pools in Michigan allow women to swim in a burqa

http://www.ciogc.org/pages/Announcements/689/pageDetailPBPFV_all.html
Law requires adhan (call to prayer) to be broadcast by mosques 5 times per day from 6 am to 10 pm

https://www.islamfortoday.com/michiganhalal.htm
Dearborn residents demand that schools serve halal lunch to children

http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0810/p01s03-woam.html
Canada...Muslims here, supported by a 1991 provincial law, have been using sharia to mediate legal disputes, such as divorce and child custody. But in the spring, after a Muslim group proposed creating a formalized tribunal, what had been going on quietly for more than a decade became front-page fodder and led to a government review of the law.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4215182.stm
Protests have been held in cities across Canada aimed at stopping Ontario province from adopting sharia-based law to settle Muslim family disputes.

http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/006375.php
Quebec rejects introduction of Sharia law into legal system

Answer 9

The same thing that happens if Christians want Biblical law in the states; politely inform them that the US is not now, nor ever has been, nor was intended to be founded as, a Christian/Muslim nation, so religious dogma has no place in creating secular policy.

Answer 10

Libs don't think it will happen. They feel like the muslims, bound by loyalty to the libs for taking their side, will listen to them and be taught by them when it comes to matters of secular democracy, womens rights and liberal social values. Ha.