I feel that she does not have the knowledge, the know how or the strenght to be a Commander / Chief. To her this is all about the celebrity and she is out-of-line to be running. She thinks she should be president of our nation, cause she can raise money. Where is she coming from, with no foundation to her campaign and changing the person she is to the person she is talking to. Why the hell are we doing this?
2007-04-03 08:27:00 · 11 answers · asked by LindaAnn 4 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Medicine
Do not answer talking about George W Bush.
2007-04-03 08:45:38 · update #1
TO I'M LISTENING---- IT'S MY QUESTION, I'm tired of hearing about Bush when the question has nothing to do with him. It sounds just like Hillary when you ask her a question, she knocks the current administration, she has no facts either. I'm looking for facts.
2007-04-05 03:12:19 · update #2
I would argue Hillary is a good, an intelligent mediator between the thousands of interests. But, should she be elected, I expect the "same old, same old". The next "leader of the Western World" needs to clean our own house first, before we go out and make demands on the rest of the world.
America needs FUNDAMENTAL change. Therefore I wish for a "new John F. Kennedy": optimistic, strong, healthy, willing to challenge years and years of "best compromises".
And this is why it is urgent:
- Healthcare is a shambles (a few examples: insurance premiums and drug costs are twice that of the 'runner ups' among the industrialized nations, the number of uninsured is a national shame, dying in an American hospital can cost 20% of your life savings, hospitals appear to charge for the same procedure a different rate every time a new patient comes in, that patient's insurance premium is determined by luck, lottery and choice of employer)
- the financial future of Social Security is a total mess,
- we are in one of the costliests wars ever, with no definition of what constitutes "victory"
- the infrastructure of our cities (housing, roads, tunnels, bridges, mass transit, trains, ) is in disrepair and crumbling
- we have few ideas how we will continue to employ a majority of our workforce, the skilled millions of "blue-collar" workers (and it surely is not in remedial education, healthcare administration, selling insurance & real estate, or guarding our borders)
- "Special interests/ corruption". I hear in Washington there are 35,000 lobbyists "buying dinners" and forever "talking into the ears" of 500 or so Congressmen.
2007-04-03 10:09:50 · answer #1 · answered by Heinz H 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes, I believe she is qualified as much, if not more so, than anyone else.
Btw, your email to me was uncalled for. You don't have the right to tell us not to mention the president when we are talking about the presidential election. Perhaps, you'd like to put words in our mouths, too? This is what questions and answers are about. You have to be able to take answers that don't agree with your opinion and not get all flustered and send emails to the person that disagreed with your statement.
Some might say that you are running a smear campaign.
2007-04-03 09:50:43 · answer #2 · answered by Im Listening 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes - she is qualified. All people who get to the level of running for their party (in her case, very probable) are qualified to be president. Even though you may not agree with their policies or things they say, people who run are qualified. She has had extensive experience with organizations, is highly educated, is an elected representative and is very familiar with the White House and how things are done there (via her husband and by being first lady).
Some people like to refer to George Bush and say negative things - however, he just like all other people who run and/or get the nomination to run, are highly qualified. (I am not saying I agree with his practices or the things he does, but on paper he is qualified).
2007-04-03 09:01:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Most men and many women are threatened by strong women. Many others have great distaste for her husband. Thus the great prejudice against her.
She is definitely qualified, but won't be elected.
2007-04-03 08:49:28 · answer #4 · answered by greydoc6 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Is the incumbent qualified? it does not matter.
2007-04-03 08:35:35 · answer #5 · answered by JR 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I say yeah... but let's let America Vote...
2007-04-03 08:55:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think she is brilliant and articulate.
2007-04-04 17:24:07 · answer #7 · answered by AyeVivi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She can't possibly be any worse than Bush.
2007-04-03 08:34:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Huh?.......medically speaking NO not qualified!!!
2007-04-03 08:45:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
She can't lead her own family. What do you think?
2007-04-03 08:34:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋