What is harder to believe a dot made of gases as small as a period by chance made everything or God did it all

Question

Actually sceince proves the Bible to be correct and evolution to be fair fetch. Be forreal humans just want to not have to answer to any one , and do you think we evole from monkey;s and if that is true why aren;t we still evoling. We are on the decline phsyically and were just getting more knowledgable how to get further away from God .But we can't no matter what we do, think about what the world is teaching you , and i understand how human's make war not belief's, it's just people have to use alway's put God in thier mess. HE WANT'S A RELATIONSHIP WITH YOU NOT RELIGION, religion causes kaos not God he said to love your neighbor as you love yourself. If we practice that their won't be any problem's.

Answer 1

Wrong. The "dot" to which you presumably refer was the *Big Bang Singularity* and was not gas at all - it contained all the mass of the Universe and was therefore almost infinitely dense (gases are of course, not dense).

If "HE WANTS A RELATIONSHIP WITH ME", he can email me; I'm a pretty open guy and if *he's credible*, I'll write back.

(Speaking of "credible", try using a spell-checker... it's easy!)

Answer 2

No one said the dot (singularity) occurred 'at random', except it's religious detractors. When the rules of the universe which dictate how and why the big bang occurred are discovered then we will know. People used to think disease was either random or the will of god (or evil spirits). It's now been shown that it's causes are explanable using known scientific reasons.

Your arguments are merely a varient of the "God of the Gaps" argument flaw. You pick something unexplained, then say only god could have done it. The further we go in our understanding of the universe and reality, the less is able to be blamed on god.

But this is merely your subtrafuge to push your own beliefs. There is a vast jump between saying a god existed at the beginning of time and the ornate stuff mentioned in the bible or the koran or the talmud.

If you don't wish to look like an utter fool, take some courses in science. You obviously don't know the different between a singularity and the dot at the end of your spine.

Answer 3

Why do you think we have ceased to evolve? I don't think that is the case at all. We stand head and shoulders taller than the average Victorian. Our jaws get smaller all the time, due to our foods being easier to eat. As a result, we have redundant teeth, the wisdom teeth, which usually wind up impacted, and have to come out, as they don't fit in our smaller jaws, and are generally no use to us. Where it used to be that it was customary to remove 4 wisdom teeth, 2 on each side, I only developed 2 of them on one side, and the number of people I know with only 1 or 2 wisdom teeth is growing. This indicates to me that we are evolving to the point where we will cease to grow wisdom teeth all together in a few more generations. I have a rare blood type that only evolved 1,000 years ago, that's very new in the overall scheme of things. The human appendix once had a function of some kind in the digestive system, now it is a vestigial organ, and likely the day will come when we will be born without them. As to wether man evolved from monkeys or not, evolution doesn't say that we evolved from monkeys, but that we share a common ancestor with monkeys. A difference of a gene or two. That some of these ancestors evolved as humans, and some evolved as monkeys. If we are on the decline as a species, it is less likely to do with evolution or lack thereof, and more likely because we sit on our fat fannies answering questions like this, watching too much tube, playing too many video games, driving to places we could walk to, and eating poorly! I have a relationship with God. I still believe in evolution. I view God as the ultimate Artist / Inventor, and if you know any thing about artists and inventors, you know that we can't help continuing to tweak our designs, in search of the ultimate perfection. And no matter how perfect it may seem, there is always something to tweak. I have no problem at all with God beginning with a dot of gas as small as a period, and building on it.

Answer 4

technology is purely how guy explains how his senses stories the Universe and his relative concepts translates those alerts. no longer something relative is objectively actual and so guy's perceptions are no longer a sturdy known for determining the reality (certainty). something empirical is illusory in nature and could bypass away. phantasm is that which seems, seems actual, yet then disappears like a mirage yet certainty (certainty) is that that's and has been continually. Self is a delusion that combines and dilutes certainty (certainty) with phantasm. Time is a be conscious we use to describe phantasm and its nature on an identical time as existence is certainty and is often. existence is already everlasting although that's the deluded concepts that combines existence and time and then lives via the philosophy of "lifetime". we've been given time so as to make a determination of which we'd like extra certainty which brings us the character of the reality or extra phantasm which brings us the character of phantasm. dying is the end results of the character of phantasm. We would desire to attain what we sow. God purely does not prefer us to attend til we die yet to attain the reality now and humble the time created and hence illusory self identity for the sake of the reality that's the imagless Spirit of existence our loving Father whom Jesus got here to introduce us to and to instruct us a thank you to humble the self.

Answer 5

At least 90% of world scientists believe in evolution so it hasn't been debunked, and you shouldn't judge by credentials but actual achievements. The head of the genome project strongly advocates evolution and he's even Christian. I mean you have these scientists creating breakthroughs in technology and medical science...most believe in evolution. Don't you think you are overlooking their success? Do you personally know enough about genetics to speak for the entire scientific community?

Answer 6

A dot ?
You need help.

Evolution is real.
What do you think yip-yap lap dogs & teeny-tiny doberman pinchers came from the wild?
True ppl had a hand in it, but it still is proof of evolution.

Answer 7

There isn't on single peer reviewed article to back any of that. Scientists are overwhelmingly not Christian. Saying that science disproves evolution is an outright lie.

Answer 8

No, it doesn't. Science proves nothing of the sort. You really must know you're lying, right? Isn't there something in the bible about not lying?

You obviously know nothing about evolution. Stop trying to learn science from your church, and go to school.

Answer 9

Nothing I haven't heard before.

Since when has science proven the Bible to be correct? Maybe I missed something in my biology class..

Answer 10

It's hard to believe that you know anything about evolution or science, and I'm betting that you don't. Your spelling and grammar tells us that you're barely literate and not very well-educated.