But you didn't tell that person to steal it for you
2007-04-02 06:07:06 · 10 answers · asked by Amanda W 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
Yeah, what makes you think otherwise?
2007-04-02 06:13:22 · answer #1 · answered by silver lining 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just because you "really need" something does that give you the right to deprive the rightful owner who ALSO might "really need" it? I don't think so.
As the other blogger stated...you are certainly in possession of stolen property and in my own state could be arrested for "Receiving Stolen Property." Knowing something is stolen and then continuing to hold that property makes you just as wrong as the actual thief who took the property in the beginning.
Best wishes.
2007-04-02 13:14:37 · answer #2 · answered by KC V ™ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you accept kNOWN stolen merchandise, that is the same as stealing. The only exception being food, and only if that is the last resort, and you would have starve without the food.
2007-04-02 13:27:37 · answer #3 · answered by WC 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You'll suffer the same consequences if caught as the person stealing it.
2007-04-02 14:12:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, you are guilty of recieving stolen property. You should notify the person it was stolen from and return it to them.
2007-04-02 13:11:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Your are just as guilty as the person that stole it in the eyes of the law.
2007-04-02 13:20:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Uhh well Imn ot sure
2007-04-02 13:26:13 · answer #7 · answered by bluepizazz1832 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
2007-04-02 13:15:24 · answer #8 · answered by Stewie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's called recieving stolen proporty. Still a crime
2007-04-06 02:47:27 · answer #9 · answered by Perry B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
http://magegame.ru/?rf=416c697361
2007-04-02 13:13:53 · answer #10 · answered by tanj r 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋