English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Really, I found that evolution contradicts itself a lot because it's always asking about life and it always makes theories. Evolution Is JUST a theory. Creation tells the truth, plus evolution is an excuse of keeping God out of it.

2007-04-01 14:24:45 · 39 answers · asked by ogre_110 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

39 answers

Evolution is scientific fact, creationism is religious mythology. Can't argue with the evidence! :-)

2007-04-01 14:28:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 11 0

ONCE before I have pointed out that the written accounts of Creation should not be taken in an earthly sense. The Bible narrative also does not refer to this earth. The creation of the earth was simply the natural consequence of the further development of the first Creation.
It is almost incredible how scriptural scholars could have jumped to such an illogical and incomplete assumption as that God out of His own Perfection could, without any transition, have immediately created the gros material earth!
To get nearer to the truth of what actually happened, it is not necessary to change the "Word" of the Scriptures. On the contrary, the description of the history of Creation represents the truth much more clearly than do all the false and incomplete assumptions! It is only the erroneous interpretations which have caused a misunderstanding on the part of so many people!
These people quite rightly sense the mistake that is made by persistently placing the Paradise referred to in the Bible on this gros material earth, which is so far remote from the Divine. It surely cannot be so little known that the Bible is primarily aspiritual book! It gives clarification about spiritual events, man only being mentioned where he has an immediate relationship with these spiritual things in order to illustrate and make them clear.
Finally even the human intellect can understand - because it is so natural - that the Bible narrative of Creation does not refer to the earth, which is so far away from the Creator!
Hardly anybody will dare to dispute the fact that this immediate Creation of God, designated as the first Creation, can only be looked for in His immediate neighbourhood, because it was the first to emanate from Him, and is thus bound to be in Gloser connection with Him! No calm and clear thinker will expect that this first and original Creation was enacted just on this earth, which is furthest removed from the Divine Sphere, and which only came into being in the further course of development!

2007-04-01 15:07:04 · answer #2 · answered by wellcome 3 · 0 0

The leading mathematicians in the century met with some
evolutionary biologists and confronted them with the
fact that according to mathematical statistics, the
probabilities of a cell or a protein molecule coming
into existence were nil. They even constructed a model
of a large computer and tried to figure out the
possibilities of a cell ever happening. The result was
zero possibility!

Under normal circumstances, creatures give birth to the
same kind of creatures. It is established scientific
fact that like begets like. On rare instances, the DNA
in an embryo is damaged, resulting in a mutant child
that differs in some respect from its parent. Although
a few mutations have been scientifically observed that
are beneficial, most mutations produce inferior
offspring. For the theory of evolution to be true,
there must be a fantastic number of creative mutations
that produce new kinds of offspring which are better
suited for survival, and therefore are favored by
natural selection.

Darwinists claim that the reptile-to-mammal evolution
is well documented. But for reptiles to evolve into
mammals at least some of these transformations must
have happened:

• Scales had to have mutated into hair.
• Breasts had to have evolved from nothing.
• Externally laid eggs had to evolve into
soft-shelled eggs that were nourished by an
umbilical cord and placenta in a womb.

It has never been observed in any laboratory that
mutations can cause one species to turn into another.
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/arguments.shtml

The Evolution of Man is Scientifically Disproved:
http://www.ldolphin.org/wmwilliams.html

CHALLENGING DARWIN'S MYTHS: Scholars have pointed out
flaws in evolutionary dogma.
http://www.apologetics.org/articles/myths.html

There are a number of common arguments against the
theory of evolution that creation scientists possess.
http://creationwiki.org/Theory_of_evolution

Evolution violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
There are no transitional fossils.
http://talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-misconceptions.html

Forensic evidence: Dinosaur and human footprints in the
same strata layer 'side-by-side'. The Scientific American
lists 15 common arguments against evolution and their
summary refutations. Evolution is only a theory. It
is not a fact or a scientific law.

2007-04-01 15:01:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Your first claim makes no sense. How does asking questions about life make the ToE contradictory? Also, the ToE does not "make theories", it makes predictions, which may develop into hypotheses.

Saying something is "just a theory" shows a misunderstanding of what a theory is.

A scientific explantion of phenomena that has been repeatedly tested and confirmed = Theory.

Also, Evolution does not try to "keep god out of it". Science itself cannot make use of supernatural clauses in empirical research, which means in order for science to be useful, it can only address the natural word, which works naturally.

2007-04-01 15:58:20 · answer #4 · answered by eigelhorn 4 · 0 0

this is an interesting thing in the universe my friend. i have wondered this too but then i thought, i contradict myself and i exist, the bible contradicts itself, and so does every other theory on everything if you argue it right;). so realy all you know is all you have seen in your life, just like the little rascals say the begining of time is when they were born. so technicly it may not be true but in the eyes of every human we dont remember what happend before, or do we? this gets into whether or not you believe in the zero point (for all you christions thas the belief that theres a little peice of god in all of us) oh i could go on, good questions deserve good awnsers, theology is my specialty, im me @ curvy_chick000 . by the way i would not diss creationism or evolution, there are many creation stories and also many theories, this is obviously a sign of something.

2007-04-01 14:42:09 · answer #5 · answered by curvy_chick000 4 · 0 0

The contradiction between evolution and God's creation do conflict to a large degree. The scientific theory that man comes from apes is the argument; where the neanderthal is what we use to be; contradicts very much Gods creation with Adam and Eve.

2007-04-01 14:33:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Evolution is not "just" a theory. It is a theory. As used in science, a "theory" is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena.

Any scientific theory must be based on a careful and rational examination of the facts. A clear distinction needs to be made between facts (things which can be observed and/or measured) and theories (explanations which correlate and interpret the facts.)

A fact is something that is supported by unmistakable evidence.

In science, the word "theory" is not used as Creationists use it. "JUST a theory." Creationists distort the definition of "Scientific theory" to suit their purposes.

Theories may be good, bad, or indifferent. They may be well established by the factual evidence, or they may lack credibility. Before a theory is given any credence in the scientific community, it must be subjected to "peer review." This means that the proposed theory must be published in a legitimate scientific journal in order to provide the opportunity for other scientists to evaluate the relevant factual information and publish their conclusions.

Creationists refuse to subject their "theories" to peer reviews, because they know they don't fit the facts. The creationist mindset is distorted by the concept of "good science" (creationism) vs. "bad science" (anything not in agreement with creationism). Creation "scientists" are biblical fundamentalists who can not accept anything contrary to their sectarian religioius beliefs.

2007-04-01 14:39:39 · answer #7 · answered by Jess H 7 · 1 0

First, you need to understand what theory means, from a scientific standpoint. Scientific theory does not mean a scientist "just has a wild hunch". Look it up.
Second, you need to understand that evolution theory does not (and cannot) describe HOW life began, only what happened to it AFTER it began.
Please EDUCATE yourself before making these statements, you'll not only look smarter, you'll BE smarter. Questions like this make the rest of us who believe in God look bad.
Who says God couldn't have created life and uses evolution as one of His tools?

2007-04-01 14:35:27 · answer #8 · answered by Squirrley Temple 7 · 1 0

Your word games are not even good. Genetics even proves the evolution of man, by noticing the genes of fosils of species of out simian ancestors. Including cosmic background radiation. Cosmic background radiation was predicted afew years before they found it. If you look in space far back enough you would find a temperature due to the last part of the big bang, billions of years of light years away. Relativity basicaly proves the universe curves toward a singularity. I believe from atmousphere and heat came amino acids and strains of rna that have combined and mutated in hundreds of billions of new forms in the new life in the past few hundred million years. You believe a giant created the first man and woman out of clay in a magic garden. Sorry potsy, you lose. Remember the ewoks from star wars? Thats you.

2007-04-01 14:32:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Creation is the myth of all myths...Evolution simply the explanation to explain, for example, the stages of the butterfly's metamorphosis that's all. Evolution is showing how a human's fingers become calloused because of playing the guitar so often....although my father played the guitar and I ws not born with callouses but when I started playing I got callouses on my fingers...I think though thatchanges must be more porfoiund to affect the gene structure for tyhe next generation

2007-04-01 14:31:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Yes, evolution is an evil idea created by biologists and their biased scientific agenda.

btw, we should also teach "intelligent falling" in schools because gravity also tries to take Jesus out of the equation.
Gravity is explained via "Theory of Universal Gravitation" and "Theory of Relativity." Thus Gravity is just a theory!

Everyone knows that things fall towards the center of the earth because of Jesus wants them to!!!

2007-04-01 14:29:17 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers