I wanted to do my own prints at home, and I wanted to know which printer I should get. I was leaning towards the Canon's printers but I also like Epson's printers. Which one is better in picture quality wise?
2007-04-01 12:50:47 · 3 answers · asked by Koko 4 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Photography
I have both. The Canon is a fine performer, and the print heads do not need cleaning as often. My Epson's print heads have to be cleaned almost every time I use it, perhaps because I don't print every day.
Both have good, archival output. The Canon is a bit quicker. I think you might be satisfied with either brand.
2007-04-01 13:22:56 · answer #1 · answered by Ara57 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both Canon and Epson make some excellent printers. HP has come a long way too. Depending on how serious you want to take it, I would rate Epson just slightly higher.
Printing at home is typically a little more expensive than taking it to a photo lab. But I have an Epson 2200 when I want to make larger B/W prints at exacting quality and the output is excellent.
2007-04-01 13:27:49 · answer #2 · answered by Dan A 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say picture quality wise go with Espson. Much better printer, lasts longer, though Cannon ink is cheaper, and will probably save you money there. Almost the same quality.
Don't Get HP They SUCK !!!
2007-04-01 12:54:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋