TBN...that's the Totally Biased Network?
2007-03-31 13:22:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
This is a moot point isn't it? After all who really cares what any scientists may say when this is a testament based on faith not facts.Besides science may very well eventually prove he could be resurrected in some form; be it biologically or artificially. The ability to accelerate living cells or revive them might not be too difficult for someone with these supernatural powers and knowledge. In our day and age cloning is possible also.So, it's special effects regardless.
2007-03-31 20:27:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why as a Christian would I ever want to watch TBN? Ever heard of scribes and pharisees? They have been reincarnated into TBN hosts.
Besides it is just stupid and no real scientist would try to disprove the resurrection. If the whole thing is made up they could not disprove it because there would be no evidence to disprove and if it did happen, guess what, there would still be no evidence to disprove it since it was resurrected.
2007-03-31 20:19:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I'm just surprised they haven't tried it before. Its useless of course, the only way to prove it would be to produce a body and prove it was Jesus's body, which obviously isn't gonna happen. I'm guessing no legitimate scientist would even admit to trying something so ignorant, and quacks aren't accepted by the scientic community, so the only ones who would fall for something like that would be rabid atheists, who've given up on solid evidence in their quest to try to prove their nothingness has validity.
Have no desire to watch it, I have no respect for, not would I believe anything any televangelist has to say and refuse to watch any of them. I've heard they say they sometimes actually hold beliefs I hold, but anyone who lives in a mansion they pay for out of conning gullible, innocent elderly people, puts them on the other side as far as I'm concerned. I'm a christian, but that doesn't mean I'm an idiot.
2007-03-31 20:23:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you think its sad that scientists are trying to disprove the resurrection of Jesus then it is just as sad that Jack Van Impe is trying to prove that scientists are false. It is the burden of the believer to prove in what they believe is true. If there was straight up proof of Jesus' resurrection than everyone who knew about it would believe in him. But there is not. There isn't any proof of any supreme being. I'm kind of believe in God myself but I'm using common sense. the fact is no one knows what is out 'there'.
2007-03-31 20:18:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Please! I do not believe a thing that freak Van Impe and his wife, Godzilla, have to say. I have never seen two people happier to see the doom and gloom of other people in my life. I get an evil vibe from them. Besides, Christ was resurrected in the Spirit, not the defiled vessel of the flesh.
2007-03-31 20:20:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Wisdom in Faith 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
They are probably Jewish or something. Most real scientists hold no bias and consider Christianity to have been proven false long ago, not by the hand of science, but by its own texts.
2007-03-31 20:17:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Jack Van Impe is only marginally more intelligent than his audience. Jesus resurrected? Get a grip on your mind. Jesus wasn't even a real person.
2007-03-31 20:21:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by U-98 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
You can't prove someone came back from the dead. How could you? Even if that person was here today, how could you possible prove that they died and came back? There's simply no way to test for that, in a person here today, or much less in someone who lived 2000 years ago.
2007-03-31 20:15:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by eri 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
You can't prove a negative without proving a positive.
2007-03-31 20:24:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by S K 7
·
1⤊
0⤋