This is a survey I am doing for a class to sample Americans views on the scientific theory of evolution. (If not US resident, you need not answer) Simply answer Yes FOR evolution, or No AGAINST evolution as the correct answer in regards to the creation of Humankind.
as this is in the spirituality section of Answers, a vote against will be interpreted as based on religious convictions. If otherwise see our surveys at www.YeaglyDataInst.com
2007-03-31 12:31:55 · 30 answers · asked by derek v 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
YES!
2007-03-31 12:34:25 · answer #1 · answered by Seeker 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
interesting survey. Evolution makes greater experience than creationism. Evolution is a medical theory, it has information and it makes predictions which could be verified (each medical theory needs this). Creationism has no information- for a initiate if we took the Bible at face value the Earth is purely 6000 years previous and dinosaurs have been planted the two via devil to tempt us into technological know-how and faraway from God (that damn devil lol) or via God to objective our faith. i do no longer comprehend approximately you yet i'm greater liable to have self assurance all that geology and strong information than a narrative. the element is creationism replaced right into a narrative written an extremely long term in the past to describe issues human beings have been drawn to yet did no longer comprehend, why would desire to we prepare purely one among those thoughts? If we are happy to coach one then why don't you prepare all of them from the biggest non secular ones to the hundreds from tiny villages around the international? Evolution would desire to learn in each college technological know-how type inspite of religion through fact the lesson is technological know-how no longer faith. Creationism can not at all be pronounced as technological know-how. I stay in the united kingdom and we've the bonus of having non secular analyze instructions so that is not such an argument here- evolution belongs in the technological know-how lecture room, creationism in the non secular analyze training.
2016-10-02 00:16:20 · answer #2 · answered by intriago 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-03-31 12:36:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes
2007-03-31 12:36:10 · answer #4 · answered by Momofthreeboys 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
YES.
And the above post is full of distortions and outright falsehoods. As one example Isaiah 40:22 says the "circle of the earth" a flat 2 dimensional object, not the sphere of the earth. Sphere is not a correct translation by any authority. Either the poster knows this and is an intentional liar, or his source knows this and is an intentional liar, but this is not something you get accidentally wrong:
NIV - circle
NASB - circle
The Message - a paraphrase, not a translation - says ball
Amplified Bible - a paraphrase, not a translation, says circle (horizon)
King James - circle
ESV - circle
NKJV - circle
21dt Cent King James - circle
ASV - circle
Young's Literal - circle
Darby - circle
Holman - circle
Today's NIV - circle
So when comes this magical "sphere" translation? Well, as we saw in the court cases in Pennsylvania, creationists seem to feel lying in service to their cause is not only forgivable, but mandatory. Now watch all the creationists thumbs down the truth because they prefer a lie.
2007-03-31 15:02:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes, I accept evolution.
No, evolution is not the correct answer for the "creation" of life.
That would be abiogenesis, a separate theory.
2007-03-31 12:36:19 · answer #6 · answered by Snark 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes.
2007-03-31 18:00:25 · answer #7 · answered by Dalarus 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes.
2007-03-31 12:41:57 · answer #8 · answered by scifiguy 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes.
2007-03-31 12:37:23 · answer #9 · answered by S K 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes.
2007-03-31 12:35:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes.
2007-03-31 12:35:15 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋