Coal...what a joke...alternate energy source ?

Question

fussion would be waaay better !! with coal we put even more CO2 into our fast fading planet !!....your opinion ?

Answer 1

Practical fusion power has not been developed at this time. Fission, however, is here and would be a reasonable alternative for power generation.

Answer 2

As an alternate energy source for what?
Fussion for commercial production of energy doesn't exist - yet. Coal does. If one needs energy now, which is better, something that creates CO2, or something that doesn't exist?

People produce CO2 too. CO2 isn't evil. Nearly all plants require CO2.

If the question is 'what alternative energy source can we find to replace oil? then Coal is in the running. If the question is 'what alternative energy source can we find to replace fossil fuel', then coal is out.

If the question is how do we reduce out demands for foreign energy sources, then again, coal is in - the U.S.A has lots and lots of coal.

Needless to day, a discussion on energy is complex. Much more complex than the usual 'sound bites' that one hears on the TV news, and even in most newspapers.

Answer 3

What is "FUSSION"? I think you mean fusion and I will answer based on that assumption.

You bet ya! The problem is, room temperature fusion is at least years away, probably decades and possibly centuries.

BTW, coal is not necessarily coal. There is more than one kind and their pollutants are also different.

FAST FADING??? Listen to scientists and not Politicians. Just because someone invented the Internet doesn't make him a climatologist. Al Gore is not a scientist.

Answer 4

Water by technique of far. photo voltaic is robust only for sparkling days, and for lower than 6-8 hrs on the most. Plus it really is too expensive to purchase the photo voltaic panels for electrical energy. lower than glass tubing is way less expensive yet nevertheless too short an afternoon gentle time source. Wind is more cost-effective routinely, and doubtless more advantageous hours of production universal. yet nevertheless relies upon on adequate air stream. Water from river pass is the most consistent 24/7 production. Dams, are expensive yet are multipurpose. electrical energy, irrigation, ingesting, recreation, flood administration. Paddle wheels anchored alongside rivers or streams also produce continuous electrical energy and are inexpensive. they're frequently smaller or more advantageous. Ocean waves and tides are being looked at as a continuous source also. All water factors of renewable capacity are by technique of far and away the finest. Water is heavy at 8+ lbs in accordance to gal. it does no longer take very a lot pass on a lever arm to multiply its effect dramatically.

Answer 5

We should only use power production technology that doesn't emit CO2 by only building new power plants that fit that requirement and replacing those that don't. This would make a lot of money for the power plant construction industry and alternative power industry and help save the planet at the same time.

Answer 6

There are a lot of things to consider. We have a lot of coal. Nuclear power takes very careful design and careful handling of waste. And there's a lot more factors.

But they both have a place in a good energy system. Coal plants will need systems to capture the carbon dioxide produced. People are working on it.

Answer 7

Cold water fusion would be great if it was probable. But then wo do you believe as some scientists say it can't be done and some say it can. I think they should look into solar panels on all rooftops and harnessing tides and waves.

Answer 8

How would you produce the hydrogen needed for fusion ?????

Answer 9

comparatively the effect will be minimum