When Jesus was resurrected. He fulfilled the law and became the perfect blood sacrifice--once-- for all. I don't know if the Jews stopped the practice immediately, though I doubt it, since MANY didn't believe Jesus was the Messiah. But it was no longer required immediately after His resurrection.
2007-03-31 06:06:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by beano™ 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
This has to be the tenth time I've seen this question. Never mind that there is no Temple--that is irrelevant to the real answer to this question which is: Do you really think that anyone would be allowed to do animal sacrifices here in the 21st century? The government would not allow it. And most Jews unless they are fundamentalist Orthodox Jews would be appalled to see an actual animal sacrifice. We've learned a lot in the 2,000 years since that was common. Just because it was done then doesn't mean it was right.
2007-03-31 05:25:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i visit have smash with the team. Many are very almost good, yet no longer extremely. the individuals asserting that the respond is not any, via Temple's destruction are very almost good, yet a splash incorrect. it is not mandatory for the Temple construction to be status for the sacrifices to be presented; that's in simple terms mandatory to grant them on the Temple Mount. Ezrah the Scribe, for whom the biblical e book of Esrah is named, presented sacrifices on the Temple mount whilst the 1st temple replaced into nevertheless destroyed and the 2nd replaced into no longer yet geared up. additionally, after the destruction of the Temple, there replaced right into a short era the place sacrifices have been resumed on the Temple mount in the time of the three 3 hundred and sixty 5 days reign of Bar Khokba. the explanation we can't grant them on the Temple mount now's via fact as a fashion to realize this one must be in a state of formality purity to the two bypass onto the Temple mount and to grant a sacrifice. This demands an immersion in a spring or pool that has ashes from a thoroughly crimson heifer in it. (Numbers 19) We now no longer have those ashes. The disapearence of those ashes replaced into area of a similar punishment from G-d that blanketed the Romans destroying the Temple and banishing the Jewish human beings from the Holyland, subsequently the confusion above. interior the intervening time, the prophet Hoshea urged us to apply prayer somewhat than sacrifices till we ought to reinstate them, ""Forgive all our sins and get carry of us graciously, via fact we grant the sacrifices of our lips somewhat than bulls." (Hoshea 14:2) wish that enables.
2016-11-25 02:06:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
70 A.D. Jerusalem was burned, the temple destroyed and never rebuilt. Titus made sure the temple was thoroughly destroyed. The Jewish people were dispersed throughout the world. But the Lord brought them back in 1948. The nation of Israel was born again in one day. Their original language Hebrew is spoken in Israel today. Christians know Jesus on the Cross was the ultimate sacrifice and no others are needed.
2007-03-31 04:56:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jeancommunicates 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
I will send to one example of this question already asked on here, but it has been asked several (hundred) times between then and now.. Short answer, no Temple in Jerusalem, no sacrifices anymore. Our prayers replace the sacrifices these days..
2007-03-31 05:30:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by XX 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
God said there is no forgiveness of sin without the shedding of blood. Animal sacrifices was to atone for the sins of God's children. However it had to be done over and over again- it was pointing toward the ultimate sacrifice on the true lamb of God- Jesus- once Jesus paid the price for mankind's sins once and for all- animal sacrifice was no longer needed.
2007-03-31 05:09:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by AdoreHim 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
The idea of sacrificing was to make them aware of needing an outside source for forgiveness. The bible says that Christ became a sacrifice for all and for ever. It paved the way to the need of salvation coming from God, and not through any other thing that we can do from ourselves. From what I see, if a Jewish person does not believe that Jesus was the promised one, then it seems to me that animal sacrifice is the only atonement for sin that they have, according to their belief.
2007-03-31 04:52:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
in 70 AD when Rome destroyed Jeruselum there were no temples left to make these sacrifices so instead they made offerings of prayer and praise.
2007-03-31 10:00:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Alley C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Roman Empire destroyed their temple. Therefore, they are not able to practice their tradition. There are rumors that when the third temple is built then they will start all of their traditions.
2007-03-31 04:47:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by carlos r 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Some Jews that converted to Christianity believe that Jesus was the Lamb of GOd and once He was sacrficed, they didn't need to sacrfice any other animals anymore. Jesus was the last sacrfice that needed to be made for people's sins. ANd when He rose again, He defeated death so we don't have to make sacrifices anymore.
2007-03-31 04:48:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jesus=Savior<3 4
·
2⤊
3⤋