why is it they are always hikacked and assumed to be human ancestors... wouldnt you think early Africa would have been loaded with apes ... scientifically speaking
but every ape fossil is always initially touted as predecessor to human... could this be betraying a bias in looking at the evidence... hmmmmmmm?
2007-03-31
03:36:54
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
for example, an extinct ape like Lucy, when you examin the head, the vertibra came in at a steep angle like a crouched animal would and the pelvis is tilted like a tree balancer... a knuckle locking for hand walking not upright running... sounds like a tree dweller hijacked to appear as a upright walker.... but perhaps it speaks of the poverty of the evidence for ape to man evolution
2007-03-31
03:46:06 ·
update #1