Some of the answer clearly indicates that 50% of western population is bigot and racist
2007-03-31 00:40:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
4⤋
I am so against bush thinking of going to war with iran over this...we are not the world police, we need to worry about our economy and our monkey leader, not afew soldiers from england, they are a nice big country with a capable government they can handle it themselfs, yes I'm worried for the soldiers, but I also remember how we got all up in arms about going to Iraq right after 9/11 and now look what that's become. All bush wants there is oil and we all know it!and that's all he wants in Iran as well...the oil companies were the most profitable last year, and guess who own stock in them? our beloved president monkey
2007-03-31 00:38:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Of course I would side with England. Iran is a nation lead by a 21st century version of Hitler and has a 30 year record of sponsoring terrorism. Iran chants death to America,and death to the West. Unless you are an Islamic fundamentalist, why would you side with Iran?
2007-04-01 02:14:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by ana2rosa2003 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I would side with the British because Iran has a surplus of Dentists and when Iran is defeated these Dentists could be forced to come to Britain and be used as slaves to fix the Countries teeth.
2007-03-31 00:39:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by proffesorlibtardo 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
Yes. England.
Why?
Family that was formally Islamic.
Read the holy books of Islam.
Islam still believes in the literal truth of every word.
(Christianity no longer believes (except for a minority) in the literal truth of every word of the Bible)
I am not a Christian (generally speaking, of course, but that is MORE than enough, as the specifics are even more threatening)
I know what Islam has planned for the rest of the world.
England is an ally of the United States.
Islamic countries have consistantly called for the destruction of the United States.
I am a United States citizen.
I love freedom.
I want Islam free.
Islam must join the 21st Century and embrace the West to survive.
We are in WWIII (nukes or not).
I've already chosen a side. Have any of you? Some are pretty obvious.
2007-03-31 00:35:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by mckenziecalhoun 7
·
3⤊
4⤋
England. Just call and I will join.
Because England is civilized and cultured. Iran is barbaric and holds to the violent beliefs of the Koran. Iran is a threat to the safety of the entire world. It is administered by dangerous radicals that are bent on getting those 40, nine year old virgins.
2007-03-31 00:38:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Lover of God 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
I would be for England. Iran has been taking a s**t on the rest of the world and I never trusted Yasa Arafat. The son-of-a-***** was the first person to call after 911. I have been trying to tell the whole world that we need to make Iran into a Hershey's Kiss.
2007-03-31 00:36:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by unknownsoldier1st 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
I'd side with Britain.
Reason: Mostly because I'm English, but also because I can't find any positives about Iran.
That, and there's plenty of evidence showing that the sailors were not in Iranian waters.
2007-03-31 00:38:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
No! because England is allowing America to use them against Iran. And Iran was threathening America to bomb Israel if America would declare war against them. I hope God would punish this greedy nations.
2007-03-31 00:38:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
This is an inflamatory question......no i don't believe either would be the correct choice. If however you rephrased the question to one of peace, then i would choose that side.
2007-03-31 00:34:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by kelstar 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
England
I'm English. The "confessions" from the english sailors seems rather forced, and there's the small matter that iranians have changed their story (the co-ordinates of where they found the sailors)
2007-03-31 01:31:40
·
answer #11
·
answered by Tom :: Athier than Thou 6
·
2⤊
2⤋