Like many nations they,ve raided ,there must be oil or Gold or DRUG field.They also use many Bombs to reduce the place to rubbles under the pretext or global police ?.What is the difference between a terroist and and INVADER ? i suppose both of them kill innocent human beings ?.Or does American Bomb kill rats and Terroist kill human ?.
2007-03-30 21:20:50 · 14 answers · asked by Ogbunigwe 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Let's not forget all the GOLD, OIL and DRUGS were were after when we invaded France during WW ll. You really need to think you stupid question through before you get so obvious caught in your radical crap.
And regarding your global police crack...we didn't ask for the job...it seems to me that nations ask, beg and plead for our help many times. That or your buddy the UN demands the US do the job because everyone else lacks the balls.
2007-04-06 20:11:36 · answer #1 · answered by iraq51 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't know if you know who Benedict Arnold was...but if I
felt the way you do, I should be hanged too! However I don't
side with you on anything other to anwser 'terrorist or invader'
part of your question....A terrorist in my way of thinking is a
slimy, sneaky coward which must hide under disguise to
take advantage of anyone, great or small, grown up or
child to cause harm or death, that's human dung of the lowest!
That's terrorism!
An invader can be very bad as well..most wars are started this way, but not all...invasion can be used to take over a
country, change its government to the liking of the invader
should the invader succeed..this is not always for the good
of the people...yet often times it is, because brutal dictators
can be brought down and people are freed from the brutality.
This leaves the people free to choose how they want to live
rather than someone dictating it to them...once the job is
done, the invader goes home! ( We like to call it Liberation,
which is of course something terrorists wouldn't understand).
2007-04-07 08:51:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Raided? Doesn't raided suggest that more is gained than lost? I think that we have spent more in our military actions than we have ever seen returned. So how can losing money in action be considered and act of greed? Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't we rebuild and enact programs in countries that we have had military involvement with that actually improved the country after we left? Case in point, Japan. We put in place the programs that have allowed them to become better educated and produce better products than us. Remember that the planes that bombed Pearl Harbor were of American design, and now they are the leaders in electronics and automotive innovation. So, do not say that we only fight out of greed.
2007-04-07 01:57:57 · answer #3 · answered by viol8r67 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Mineral resources? Like in Japan, Germany, Korea, Viet Nam? Exactly how much oil have we gotten from Iraq since this war started? How about NONE! Your ignorance is only surpassed by your hatred of the United States Of America
2007-04-06 11:56:04 · answer #4 · answered by Miki S 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The lack of your knowledge of what we are doing, and have done is more terrifying than Osama. Get past what the press shows and read some of the things the soldiers have written. Is is wrong for us to try to bring a bit of the 20th century to these countries while the rest of us move to the 21st? War is not nice, duh? Innocents get hurt, gee really?, But until we move past the tribal mentality and on toward a global one they will continue and unfortunately continue to be necessary.
2007-04-07 13:50:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
How dare them damn Americans invade the sacred drug fields.
That's not the American army, that's all those damn college kids on spring break. Yes please write our government we must protect the drug fields right to freedom.
And maybe they could stop killing each other in those countries then maybe we would feel bad when we dropped our bombs.
2007-03-31 04:34:29 · answer #6 · answered by gnomes31 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Your question makes no real point. In our history we have invaded Countries like France, Germany, and Japan. We have fought wars over Slavery, and free trade. You have little or no knowledge of our history.
2007-04-05 00:00:41 · answer #7 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You mean like the lush and prosperous valleys of Vietnam and North Korea?
2007-03-31 08:00:43 · answer #8 · answered by Paul C 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
And where did you get your ignorant, misguided and ill-informed position? I recommend you read more and speak less. I have long said the only stupid question is one that isnot asked but after seeing yours I may need to rethink that position.
2007-03-31 05:01:37 · answer #9 · answered by Jim G 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I have to agree with C.J.'s answer #3. Well stated!
2007-04-07 19:35:17 · answer #10 · answered by doctdon 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋