USAF aircraft operte in US navy aircraft career?

Question

Are jetplanes such as F-18 stationed in aircraft career belong to the USAF? How can USAF fight abroad if they dont have a base established?

Answer 1

there are no Air Force fixed-wing aircraft aboard a Navy carrier, Navy fixed-wing aircraft that are carrier based, or carrier capable, are specially designed and fortified to handle carrier operations.
Air Force fixed-wing aircraft that are currently overseas were flown there, refueled Mid-Air by tankers, they are currently stationed at former Iraqi Air Force bases, and at U.S.bases in Saudi Arabia to name a few.

Answer 2

Actually Air force planes CAN land on an Aircraft Carrier, however there is only one plane that can do it at this time and that is the C-130 Hercules. The Air force and Navy proved it could be done about twenty years ago by putting up the emergency netting to stop the plane as C-130's do not have an arrestor hook and a C-130 can take off from an aircraft carrier as the ship's deck is long enough to do so. The Joint Strike Fighter is being designed to alieviate the incompatability of Air Force Jets and Navy Aircraft Carriers.

BTW, The F-18 Hornet is a Navy jet and is Carrier-capable. You prolly meant the F-16 Falcon or the F-15 Eagle. Generally we have mutual-defense treaties with more than a few strategically selected countries around the world and can use either their bases or their airports for Air force operations through these agreements.

Answer 3

No. The Air Force has no aircraft capible of landing on an aircraft carrier. I have seen Air Force HH-53 and Special Operations helicopters come and go from aircraft carriers.

Answer 4

Air Force aircraft are not designed to land on aircraft carriers. Substantial reinforcement of the landing gear (in addition to several other important modifications) is required to safely land on a carrier.

Air Force aircraft can remain inflight for as long as the pilot is capable of flying (with aerial refueling). So, we can launch bombers from South Dakota, bomb Baghdad, and land them again in South Dakota. A forward base is not required for operations, though it is MUCH cheaper that way.

Answer 5

as other posters have mentioned, Air Force planes lack the arresting gear...the tail hook.....and the beefed up landing gear naval aviation HAS to have......

and you hit the nail on the head about how useful is the Air Force if there aren't bases in the area of operations......yes, B1, B2s and B52s can fly non stop with LOTS of tanker aerial refueling from the USA to anywhere, but it kind of takes a long time to fly 10,000 miles to bomb a target.......same deal, even more so with the 15's and 16s......there is also mandated crew rest in the Air Force.....after a certain number of hours the Air Force pilots have to go take a nap.

That's why we have carriers........sovereign US territory that can loiter for months 12 miles off a coast ( although they generally stay further off) and can put 60 attack planes in the air on an hours notice and keep doing it till there's nothing left to shoot at......

Answer 6

maximum of our fixed wing airplane are certainly AF or ANG. From a provider, as has been stated, the army and marine officers/warrant officers are the pilots. the upkeep is complete via army workers The AF forward deploys components in a fashion that the army can't. apart from, the AF employs airplane for missions that the army has no forte or interest in. In iraq for northern and southern watch, the AF performed a pivitol functionality in securing and directing the no-fly zones in iraq. apart from, the airforce has MANY forward bases in the area which, coupled with refueling skill enable the air rigidity to strike any area of the international. to whether or no longer the AF would desire to be rolled into the army, that would desire to be 3 steps backwards in the developement of the militia. the concentration of naval airpower is first for fleet protection and 2d for air skill projection. The AF concentration is on setting up dynamic air and area superiority, strategic bombardment, precision international strike skill and a secondary concentration in air to floor attempt against help. This distinction in concentration can provide the AF with unique applications that the army would desire to not at all address... till you could prepare me a C-5, C-17, B-2, B-1B or B-fifty two that would land on an airplane provider. ultimately, the AF is the main appropriate rigidity in the our on line international conflict section, and can provide different applications some distance previous usual airframe/payload transport. All of those complicated missions might take many years to effectively flow between branches of provider.

Answer 7

USAF aircraft are not equipped to land and take off from naval carriers ! Air force planes are designed for landing on fixed air stripes, whereas naval planes are equipped and reinforced for short abrupt landings, and I believe, catapulted take offs !

Answer 8

Nope, Navy aircraft are based on land and on carriers, they also own the Marine Corps aviation assets.

Answer 9

Our military has bases all over the place, and has privileges at the bases of our allies... At least one of the major bases in Iraq is considered an "Air Force" base...