2007-03-30 06:03:01 · 9 answers · asked by mack k 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
No.. and his record proves it.
2007-03-30 06:14:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think in order to be weak and a coward, he would have already given up in Iraq and Afghanistan and withdrew our troops. Oh wait, I just described the Liberals and Democrats. Bush seems to be one of the few that are still willing to win this conflict and are trying to move forward, not backwards. I don't think this is the trademarks of a weak coward.
2007-03-30 13:16:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
If he was a coward he would have brought the troops home, however, since he has not cut and run from Iraq and remained stable he may just be the strongest commander and chief ever.
2007-03-30 14:06:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
no! Don't you think that if he was weak and a coward he would have given in to the dems by now. whether you like him or not I don't think you can honestly say that he is weak and a coward.
2007-03-30 13:13:44 · answer #4 · answered by tngirl1320 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
OMG NO!!!Bush is a awesome president!!! Do you think his choices are so easy to make against popular demand? He makes very hard choices!!! He says what he means and means what he says!! Show some Respect IDIOT!!!
2007-03-30 13:32:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
And how would you have any information to make that judgement?
What is your service record? How long have you been President?
2007-03-30 13:49:17 · answer #6 · answered by Dave_Stark 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so. He knows where his heart his.
2007-03-30 14:10:44 · answer #7 · answered by Rusty Shackleford 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No
2007-03-30 13:14:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
no
2007-03-30 13:12:35 · answer #9 · answered by Centurion529 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋