I think that if you want to lie your life that way then what should stop you?
Men have been doing it for god knows how long its time for women to do the same.
Myself and a couple of friends lived our life like that for a couple of years while i was studying as a student. now a couple of us are settled and have children with a relationship which was formed in those days
I see no harm in doing it as long as you are responsible, take precaution and are not hurting anyone
2007-03-30 04:13:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I have a big issue with that. I personally feel that the reason men aren't ready to settle down in a relationship until they are old, fat, bald, and ugly is because too many women are willing to sleep with them and have no strings attached. Who wants a guy after that?
There are too many women out there who sleep around and when the decent women won't put out on a first date the guy doesn't stick around.
I've talked to male friends and they admit that if a girl is willing to sleep with them right away, yeah they'll sleep with them but think they are sluts afterwards.
2007-03-30 04:15:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by teacher101 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Okay. So. You want women to withhold sex in the absence of a commitment because that way, the men will essentially feel forced to commit? Oh, yeah. That's the type of commitment I'm looking for.
Honestly, if you have issues with sex being taken lightly, then why narrow your concern to the women alone? That's rather archaic. Why the double standard? If you oppose casual sex, fine, oppose casual sex. If you don't oppose it, don't oppose it. But to oppose it for some? And, worse, to oppose it on the grounds that, essentially, it's messing things up for *you*? I'd really hoped we'd gotten past that sexist double standard. (I knew we hadn't...but I still hoped.)
2007-03-30 04:13:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by ljb 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Lol. I think women and men both have the right to have "sex with no strings." It's up to the two people doing it. I don't personally like the concept of people having casual sex (it's dangerous, causes mixed emotions, etc.), but it's still the right of the people involved.
2007-03-30 04:05:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by crabbyone 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
I think the problem is you are taking sex way to seriously, I am in committed marriage, the reason for my commitment is that I met a woman that is in all ways compatable with me, emotionally, sense of humor, values, and sexually. I would still be in that committed relationship without the sex. By your logic, men would only marry for sex.
2007-03-30 04:06:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I don't have a problem with women who are more sexually active. I just don't like the double standards. If you don't like it, then don't pay attention to the ones that are getting all the action. People are accountable for their own actions. So if so and so woman wishes to be freely available to men, then don't worry about it. You are not her. It's not your name that people might attach a title too.
2007-03-30 04:15:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rumin 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
As long as it's done with people you know. I recommend having FwB relationships with a friend to whom you are strongly attracted, but with whom you could NEVER be in love. Maybe we just don't want committed relationships anymore. Ever thought of that?
2007-03-30 04:12:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rio Madeira 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
I think there should be more women that want sex with no strings. Why not? Why can't women do whatever they want without having to be labled?
2007-03-30 04:05:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Just a friend. 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
It's not right for anyone to behave that way, male or female. -yk
2007-03-30 04:04:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Yaakov 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Men can do it, and they get praised for it so why can't we?
2007-03-30 04:05:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by xStacex 3
·
2⤊
2⤋