I bet this one wouldn't have went the distance!
2007-03-29 22:16:35 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Boxing
JULIAN WAS A GREAT PUNCHER SO THERE FORE HE HAD A PUNCHERS CHANCE. JULIAN WAS KO ARTIST, AVERAGE BOXER AND HIS CHIN WAS NOT ALL THAT STRONG EITHER.
IN THIS BOUT I PICK HEARNS BY A KO INSIDE OF TEN ROUNDS.
2007-03-30 07:28:40 · answer #1 · answered by smitty 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
At his best, Julian Jackson was a solid Jr. middle weight. Hearns was one of the greats, and would have walked right through Julian. It would have been an easy fight for Tommy, Julian wouldn't have been able to get past the Hearns jab, and if he tried, he would have ran into a big right hand.
Hearns by KO inside six rounds.
Blogbaba was ringside for the Hearns/Grant fight, Tommy turned an ankle, neither fighter had hurt the other, it was a freak accident. Grant was game, and nobody was happy to see Tommy quit on his stool with a balooning ankle. Hearns limped away from the ring with a TKO loss without really getting hit solid. I think that fight was why Hearns had a few more after that, he didn't want to go out on such a note, after such a storied career.
2007-03-30 11:44:41 · answer #2 · answered by blogbaba 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Insane Unknown ~
In my opinion, you're right when you wrote this one wouldn't go the distance. The "Hit Man" and the "Hawk" would stand there and belt it out with overhand and straight right hands while the fight lasted.
The Hawks chin was always questionable even though he could crack like a mule. So was Tommy's, but I believe the competition that stopped Jackson couldn't stop Hearns and if it were turned around every fighter that stopped Hearns would be able to stop Jackson. We can put Jackson's knockout loss to Quincy Taylor and Hearns to Uriah Grant off to the side because these knockouts happened after they were not in their primes.
Julian would land some nice shots on Hearns and would be close to stopping him at least once. Hearns took the overall punishment better than Jackson. Herans fought back with incredible intensity when he would be hurt, Julian became a battle shy fighter when he got hurt.
I'd have to say that Hearns would catch Jackson in the 5th round with a straight right hand and drop him. Julian wouldn't be able recuperate referee would put a halt to the contest.
This would have been a great fight. Thanks for the question Insane Unknown.
2007-03-30 00:48:55 · answer #3 · answered by Santana D 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
those 2 men be able to blow one yet another's head off and one ingredient's for particular, this wont very last the area. I cant tell obviously who's had the ease in potential yet when there is one ingredient that separates those 2 warriors, that is potential. Tommy will outbox Jackson the total 5 rounds. that glint jab became certainly an efficient weapon that even Leonard's high quality had the hardest time to unravel. Julian will only haven't any answer and in six Tommy flattens him with that thunderous looping suitable. Hitman hits the mark. boom! suitable on the butt. Julian never receives up. very last verdict Thomas Hearns wins through KO in 6
2016-12-03 00:32:49 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that would be an awesome fight with both fighters tee-ing off on each other for five rounds.both were legitimage KO artist and both had shaky chins so one would have met the floor for sure! ill put my money on hearns because jackson didnt have head movment and he woudnt have been able to reach hearns figuring hearns was six feet two!
2007-03-30 05:23:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hearns lands his bombs first and takes Jackson out in round 2.
2007-03-30 03:49:05 · answer #6 · answered by Brent 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Tommy Hearns was one of the best ever, he would have won
2007-03-29 22:21:30 · answer #7 · answered by robert l 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chuck Norris. He would kill them both with a single roundhouse kick.
2007-03-30 00:31:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
HEARNS
2007-03-29 22:29:03 · answer #9 · answered by gman 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋