true love is the answer.
reason: If everyone truly loved everyone and everything then there would be no need for tolerance.
2007-03-29 14:18:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by thedarkbristow 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
you're making a competent factor and that's the reason there are fundamentalists who say their way is right and all others are incorrect and that they're going to burn in hell for no longer believing in what they do. The fundamentalists follow their faith to the letter all is because it says and there is not any gray of their paint field. Now a faith that asserts there way is right and would not lie and accepts others as properly hm perhaps Buddhists undergo in recommendations Buddha reported there are various the right thank you to learn enlightenment many paths that carry approximately a similar trip spot. this might properly be a philosopher for helpful and that i've got faith that if the is one God and one basically that God does no longer choose so you could be tolerant to human beings worshipping different gods as that's forbidden a minimum of via the Christian God.
2016-11-24 22:40:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your definition of tolerance is not exactly correct. It means:
to tolerate. A person can tolerate many things, but I don't
believe to tolerate injustice/cruelty/inhumane treatment/
controlling people is any part of Christian tolerance. To tolerate
a person's indescretions and infringements is one thing.
To tolerate an absolutely unlawful and cruel person is another. To live in a society with no rules and no punishment is to embrace anarchy. God is the God of order. Everything He has made and keeps has order down to the most minute cell.
2007-03-29 20:36:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tolerance for many means to put up with things to preserve the peace, so tolerance does not necessarily mean acceptance.
Love is not something we humans feel for no reason so there must be a different answer to world peace and it is that EVERY one must contribute towards it, not only a few.
2007-03-29 14:24:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Imogen Sue 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Your question is a good one but the descriptions of tollerance and love you wrote are too extreme.
I think you need an ample amount of both tollerance and love for a peace that will last, but there are always going to be things society can not accept like rape, murder, etc. that need to be policed....with some luck the human race will learn to love each other regardless of the color of our skin, religion, origin or sexual orientation...but hate and fear run deep.
2007-03-29 14:27:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by universatile love 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
tolerance. we don't need to love or like everyone, we can dislike them, but still be tolerant of people who are different. and if we all just are accepting and tolerant of others then the world will be a better place.
2007-03-29 14:26:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by piccplayr 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
It is a combo of both that will pave the way to true peace. One must love each other enough to be tolerant of the differances each of us posses. One can't have one without the other.
Take a family for example. You love them but are tolerant of thier habbits and quirks that make each of you differant. It is the same with the World Family. We must understand that we have love for mankind yet show respect for the individual.
2007-03-29 14:21:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by last_red_dragon 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Tolerance of murderers, rapists, suicide bombers, and child molesters will not lead to peace.
Neither will proclaiming your love for them.
The human race will always have members who are selfish and care nothing for anyone else. These people should be neither loved nor tolerated.
The only realistic way for peace to be found is if it is enforced at the point of a sword.
2007-03-29 14:24:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by scifiguy 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Tolerance.
2007-03-29 14:16:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by S K 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
For me, both. no tolerance without love and no love without tolerance. same like marriage. tolerate + love = happy couple and happy family.
tolerate + love = no war, mercy, justice, no crime, no hater, no racist, no force
2007-03-29 14:54:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Tia 3
·
0⤊
0⤋