English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-29 13:30:02 · 13 answers · asked by Zoe 3 in Politics & Government Immigration

Presidential candidate and Governor Bill Richardson (D-N. Mex) says that the wall being erected on the U.S.-Mexico border should not be built. “It’s bad policy. It was done to get Gingo votes,” Richardson said. “And the next president should not build it. I wouldn’t build it. If any part of it is built I will tear it down if I am president.”

Richardson argued that the wall is also bad for the environment. “The wall interferes with natural Latino migratory patterns,” Richardson said. “They come north to feed in the lush Norte Americano economy. They often send money back to help rear their offspring.”

populations, excessive inbreeding, and genetic deterioration,”
Richardson called for all Latinos to unite behind his presidential bid. “By electing a fellow Latino, Mexicans can insure their future,” Richardson urged.“Blocking these traditional migratory path

2007-03-29 13:37:10 · update #1

13 answers

So what it boils down to is that instead of uniting the country - he is playing to a small portion of society? And he thinks that such is going to make him the kind of person people are going to want to elect?

His words are of the type that even hispanic people that I know are not going to feel comfortable with.

Not just talking about tearing down the wall along a portion of the southern states - but totally ignoring the many others represented within this country - - this boy won't go anywhere nationally with such an approach. Why - we have that very thing right now in the Whitehouse - and it is going over like a pile of dog poo on the front room floor.

2007-03-29 13:57:45 · answer #1 · answered by Toe the line 6 · 3 1

LMAO!

“The wall interferes with natural Latino migratory patterns,” Richardson said. “They come north to feed in the lush Norte Americano economy. They often send money back to help rear their offspring populations, excessive inbreeding, and genetic deterioration,”

Richardson makes illegal aliens sound like buffalo.
This can't be an authentic quote.

2007-03-29 23:33:10 · answer #2 · answered by Lakota 3 · 2 0

I can not stress the critical importance of this issue, we stand now on what could be the turning point of a massive civil unrest that is boiling just bellow the surface of this nation, if we fail now, we fail forever, there will be no make ups on this one, our nation must remain a sovereign American nation with American laws and American ideals, Written in 1782, Thomas Jefferson expressed misgivings about the potential impact of immigration on American society. He was concerned that immigrants would "bring with them the principles of the government they leave" and that "their principles, along with their language, they will transmit to their children. In proportion to their numbers, they will share with us in the legislation."

The increasingly visible enclaves of undigested Asian, African, and Latin American immigrants which have sprung up in California, New York, Illinois, Florida, and elsewhere testify of Jefferson's prescience. A nation divided cannot stand, if amnesty is passed I shudder to think of what will occur. If you love your country, don’t allow this amnesty for law breakers it will only bring our nation ever closer towards destruction.

This governor of Nuevo Mexico Bill, Richardson is nothing more then the end result of the Mexican invasion and Mexicanization of American politics, his family is from Mexico, he has Hispanic heritage and therefore he sympathizes with the invading hordes. Last year he supported an amendment of his states name to “Nuevo Mexico,” but it failed in the state legislature. Cruz Bustamante (former vice governor and La Raza “the race” and MECHa leader) of California is exactly the same way, if he had won against Arnold, CA would have become official a Mexican state.

All Americans of every ethnicity the time is near when we will wage war against those who would destroy our nation, soon people like Richardson will find the firing squad to their front. Buy GUNS and ammo, we are going to need them!

2007-03-29 22:27:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Zoe, I trust you, truly I do, but I have GOT to evaluate this link in context. Can you give us the link? Are you SURE this isn't a parody?

'Natural Latino Migratory patterns'?

He'd be saying good bye to a presidential bid before he even really got going.

2007-03-29 21:50:59 · answer #4 · answered by DAR 7 · 1 0

Immigration is one of the major problems facing the United States at this time. To date, no one has come up with an adequate solution that can be enforced.

Should he get elected to be president, yes he could tear down the wall....however it is doubtful that he will be elected.

2007-03-29 21:15:19 · answer #5 · answered by scotishbob 5 · 1 1

As a matter of fact Mexico has destoyed a part of that wall already, guess what ? you were building it in mexican territory, lol.

No one can tear appart that wall but the US but don't expect respect for that wall, many ppl not just from México, also central america will get to that wall and open holes dig tunnels or jump the wall so, i really think the dessert it's a thoughest obstacle than just a 15 foot tall wall. . . sorry... btw i'm not saying something that you didn't knew before and thats just the sad truth

2007-03-29 20:41:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

While the state does have the right to remove this wall, the federal government can threaten to cut federal funding to the state. I doubt the governor would risk that.

2007-03-29 20:36:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

It's arguable. Maybe..... depending on the specifics.

States are sovereign. So, unless Congress actually uses eminent domain to take the land away from the states and make it a federal reserve, the states still have final say over it.

2007-03-29 20:34:17 · answer #8 · answered by coragryph 7 · 4 2

Yes, if he becomes President. I would like to see a link to the statements you claim Bill Richardson made. I think it is just more of the hyperbole you so embrace.

2007-03-29 23:09:57 · answer #9 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 1 3

Well, we certainly know to whom he is pandering, don't we?

The answer is that it is a federal project, so he could just delete the funding from any budget he proposes.

2007-03-29 20:54:25 · answer #10 · answered by neoimperialistxxi 5 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers