I saw a man write that babies go to hell when they die because of original sin. It was Soldier of God. I got so angry I went straight up and turned left. Can you believe the ignorance? That was my hate mail I sent.
2007-03-29 10:56:14 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
If only, only ONCE someone could explain the awful contradiction between the loving & wrathful god! Can it truly make sense to ANYONE that god created everything, & he could have been so nice! but created evil? How come god didn't nuke Satan a long time ago? Because so many people can BLAME Satan for the sinful things they do. That's why. Please, I've had enough of Adam & Eve. (Eve, who was made from Adam's rib & yet some people are saying males have an "extra" rib?) Hmmm. Why would god put the "temptation" of SIN there in the first place, (knowledge), just so he could watch us all burn in hell, eternal torment, lake of fire, & so on & so on. This "fear" factor is in the imaginations of some people. The patriarchal god who MUST be worshipped, & obeyed. Human ego stuff. Yikes. I thought I was in psychology! I'm OUT of here.
2007-03-30 16:18:52 · answer #1 · answered by Valac Gypsy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah...see, the tree was also in its first year of production and there was not that many apples on it. As a matter of fact, it was probably the ONLY apple on that tree and was intended by God to be used for seed. I guess that was because he/she or it, had made everything so quickly and he,she or it, had big plans for all of the 'first created' stuff. And then without his/her or its' approval and not having time to educate Eve about seed productivity, that biitch ate the one and only apple on the whole damm tree. Yeah, that was definitely a sin. I mean how damm greedy can you get? And what other reason could God have had for being so mad about somebody eating one damn apple?
2007-03-29 11:20:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree with original sin...I mean that we have it. But I do not know where unbaptized and unborn babies go if they die.
I do know that God loves us so much he sent his own son to die a horrific death...so I can't imagine he'd send babies to hell. I trust him...he has more compassion and more mercy then I could ever hope to have
Seems to me that it's just something we do not need to wonder or worry about. God is perfect and will do the most perfect and just thing.
2007-03-29 11:15:56 · answer #3 · answered by Misty 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No I don't agree with the concept of original sin or the concept of sin in general. In my opinion the concept of both original sin and sin are just tools to make people feel as if they are worthless in every way possible. It's an insult. They use this as a way to try to humble people and break them down so that they will eventually conform to their particular way of thinking.
2007-03-29 11:04:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Wow...concept-frightening question. How can we no longer be inspired, to a particular volume, by technique of our environment? i imagine that what we see, listen and adventure consistently permeates our subconscious and manifests itself in our concepts, behaviors, moves, expressions, etc. no matter if we comprehend it or no longer. To me, the approach is seamless and out of our administration, and on account that that is the case, then per chance no longer some thing is unique. that is at the same time as Jarmusch prices Godard that the line is drawn, so a concepts as i'm worried. there's a huge distinction between being heavily inspired by technique of what's at modern round you and incorporating it in what you produce vs. making a carbon reproduction of it, calling it your individual and leaving it there. no matter if no longer some thing is unique by technique of those criteria, i imagine that plagiarism can nonetheless exist. To take some thing of somebody else's, and not attempt to take the idea any extra, is robbery and is incorrect.
2016-12-03 00:03:57 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dont make sense no babies=no original sin but no original sin also makes no continuation of the human race so whoever thought this one up is retarded
the "original sin" is instinct all animlas do it. you cant get much more natural, to him i say without the original sin he would not exist.
2007-03-29 11:05:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Have you actually read this story?
God made knowledge of good and evil forbidden! KNOWLEDGE not good and evil themselves JUST THE KNOWLEDGE OF IT! In short God made FREEWILL forbidden!
And people want to say that this God is love! Wanting people to be puppets is NOT loving!
Additional note: Knowledge of good and evil doesn't give anyone a disposition towards either. It only gives people the ability to make choices! FREEWILL!
We can thank Satan for our freewill!
2007-03-29 11:02:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
When babies die before the age of accountability, which is 8 years-11years of age depending what church you go to, they go staight to Heaven. No questions asked.
2007-03-29 11:43:25 · answer #8 · answered by Luv&Rockets 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I lot of people believe that unbaptized babies go to Hell, or purgatory, or limbo or whatever. I don't believe in any of that. I think that all human beings cease to exist when they die, and that's the end of it.
2007-03-29 11:00:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
I do not agree with original sin because it makes women seem lower than men. I do believe that Adam and Eve ate form the forbiden tree but it was Satan that told them to eat from it not Eve. and this is a sin they commited and were forgiven for it is not carried on our backs so babies are born pure and sinless if one dies they will go to heaven.
2007-03-29 11:01:49 · answer #10 · answered by unknown 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋